naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RFI re Rode NT4 stereo mic.

Subject: Re: RFI re Rode NT4 stereo mic.
From: John Campbell <>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:25:25 +1000
Rode has a reputation as a maker of good quality microphones at a 
reasonable price.  I've not used one myself, but I recall fairly 
afirmative reviews of earlier models in the now sadly defunct Studio 
Sound.  And there's a clue there, Syd.  I doubt that too many have 
been road tested (pardon the pun).  Of course, that should be 
subtropical forest tested.  Others on this list have praised 
Sennheiser mics for their reliabilty in such conditions, and I know 
from experience that Sennheisers have worked where other mics have 
failed.  So I'd only buy the Rode if I could try it thoroughly first, 
and in the southern hemisphere, I'd wait until midsummer before 
testing.

Good luck with the lyrebird.  I wouldn't mind some of that myself. 
I'm on the trail of one in Kinglake National Park, not far northeast 
of outer suburban Melbourne.

John Campbell

 
>Hello Naturerecordists,
>
>Anyone out there who has used the Rode NT4 Stereo Condenser mic., and can
>comment on it - especially as to how it stands humidity, which is sometimes
>a problem with otherwise excellent microphones?
>
>MusicLab in Brisbane are the most helpful commercial firm (of any sort of
>business) that I've dealt with.  In a couple of days they fixed my 36 yr-old
>Uher recorder to satisfy my whim to record an Albert's Lyrebird in the same
>place and with the same recorder and Uher mic where I made my first lyrebird
>recording on 22.06.68.  (Wish me luck for tomorrow morning!)
>
> And when I was collecting the Uher, MusicLab volunteered the advice that
>the NT4 is an excellent mic, and modestly priced for such high quality.
>With such a recommendation from MusicLab, I sit up and take notice.
>
>Be glad of any advice, especially with reference to the specifications
>copied below, which I lack the technical knowledge to understand.
>
>Syd Curtis in Brisbane.
>
>________________________________________
>
>
>Acoustic principle: Stereo Mic. 90 degreeXY placement.  Each side comprises
>an externally polarised single diaphragm condenser transducer.
>Capsule size:   0.5" (13mm)
>Active electronics: JFET impedance converter with bipolar output buffer
>Directional Response    Cardioid (see graph)
>[Sorry; I can't reproduce the graph.]
>Output impedance:   200 ohms per side
>Frequency response:     20Hz to 20 kHz (see graph)
>Sensitivity:        -38 dB re 1v/Pa+/- 2dB equivalent to 12mV/Pa where
>                1 Pa = 94dBSPL
>Equivalent noise:   <16dBSPL, (A-weighted per IEC268-15)
>Maximum output:     +13.9dBu @ 1% THD into 1k_
>Dynamic Range:  >128 dB
>Maximum SPL:    143 dB @ 1% THD into 1k_
>Signal/Noise Ratio :    78dB
>Power requirements:     4mA, P48 (38V-52V) 2.8 mA (P24 (20V-26V)
>                    2.8mA P12 (10.8V-13.2V) 2.4mA using 9V battery
>Packed weight:  2.3 kg (Mic. only 480g)
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU