canberrabirds

Blitz wind up

To: "" <>
Subject: Blitz wind up
From: Martin Butterfield via Canberrabirds <>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 01:05:42 +0000
Two key points to cover in any discussion with BLA.
1)  not to restrict the data to Birdata: in my recent experience that is about 1% of the data collected by eBird;
2) there needs to be great attention given to recruiting the very high quality analysts.  Observers are already doing the job, and have been since Atlas 1..



On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 09:29, <> wrote:

Hi Mark

 

I agree that a coordinated process like the Atlas would be a much more effective way of getting a national picture of bird population trends and it is the trends that we should be concerned about.  Species can be recorded but it is the numbers that is the critical aspect and we (AWSG and the Asian Waterbird Census that Wetlands International does in SE Asia)) have been seeing this with declining numbers of shorebirds (with over 40 years of data collected) and waterbirds more broadly.

 

I am happy to canvass the idea of another Atlas with both Kate and Sean Dooley and see what they think. It is of course a big exercise but if done and done properly we would get a much clearer national picture of bird population trends which also has the benefits of giving governments and other decision makers solid information. Part of any Atlas survey must have funds for the essential analysis of data collected plus other data that could be included.

 

Regards

 

Alison

 

 

 

From: Mark Clayton <>
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2023 8:37 AM
To: Chris Davey <>; ; 'Philip Veerman' <m("pcug.org.au","pveerman");" target="_blank">>;
Subject: RE: [Canberrabirds] Blitz wind up

 

Good morning Alison,

 

I meant to reply to your original email but got tied up with other things. Like Chris I think this is an excellent idea and happy that I suggested it. Several comments to my original post missed the point, it is not just in certain local areas where things are rapidly declining, it is a national problem. I have been saying this for a long time now but keep getting the same reply “but people are still recording species x, y and z” but just don’t realise that their numbers are way down.

 

If Birdlife Australia doesn’t want to do a National Atlas then perhaps COG could/should redo the local one that was done quite a few years ago now. Things like the GBS and Blitz weekends don’t really show what is happening long-term and across broad areas, they only cover very small areas at best.

 

Mark

 

 

Sent from Mail for Windows

 

From:
Sent: Tuesday, 24 October 2023 10:20 PM
To: ; ; m("pcug.org.au","pveerman");" target="_blank"> 'Philip Veerman'; m("lists.canberrabirds.org.au","Canberrabirds");" target="_blank">
Subject: RE: [Canberrabirds] Blitz wind up

 

Hi Alison, I think that would be an excellent suggestion as long as the protocol is the same as the previous Atlas.

 

Chris

 

From: Canberrabirds On Behalf Of
Sent: Monday, 23 October 2023 2:44 PM
To: 'Mark Clayton'; 'Philip Veerman';
Subject: Re: [Canberrabirds] Blitz wind up

 

Hi Mark and others

 

It might be a very good time to propose to BirdLife Australia that an Atlas of Australia would be a very god idea sitting on both the Blitz and the Aussie Bird Count. I have just met with the new CEO of BLA and would be happy to raise this suggestion with her if it is felt this would be a good thing to do.

 

Regards

 

Alison

 

 

Alison Russell-French OAM

PO Box 101

Curtin  ACT  2605

M: +61 419 264 702

 

 

 

From: Canberrabirds <> On Behalf Of Mark Clayton via Canberrabirds
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2023 12:50 PM
To: Philip Veerman <>;
Subject: Re: [Canberrabirds] Blitz wind up

 

I know that Philip is a very good birder and for him to say that things are not good bird wise just backs up what I said in an email to Nicki this morning and have been commenting on for quite a few years now. Climate change with the two extremes in weather we have had, coupled with the excess removal of trees, both natural and planted, for the expansion of suburbia and on farmland, and the general “cleaning up” of paddocks has had a major impact on birds EVERYWHERE. I have been surveying birds both professionally and as an amateur for nearly 60 years. I think it is now time for Birdlife Australia, if it wants to continue as supposedly Australia’s premier birding organisation, to redo an “Atlas of Australia’s Birds”, I think they will get an almighty shock as to just what is happening. I can remember 30 – 40 years ago driving down country roads and seeing Willie Wagtails and Yellow-rumped Thornbills fly off the road, other Thornbill and fairy-wren species doing much the same. Now the occasional Magpie-lark, Apostlebird and a lot fewer White-winged Choughs are to be seen. There are some birds on the ACT”s Threatened Species list that I, and I know a lot of others, consider should not be on it, and a lot more that should. We are finding the same is happening with our bird banding site near West Wyalong, an area that still has a lot of native vegetation in the general area. I was surprised to find species like the Noisy Miner, Common Starling and Common Myna were in very few numbers in areas I have surveyed in previous years.

 

Be interested in hearing people’s comments.

 

Mark

 

Sent from Mail for Windows

 

From:
Sent: Monday, 23 October 2023 10:31 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [Canberrabirds] Blitz wind up

 

I did 10 sites over the 2 days, with about 95 km travel, which is the most travel I have done for birding for a very long time but probably a lot less than most other people. Even though pleasant being out, the low numbers of birds in species and individuals is getting concerning. For example at Castle Hill which in most years it has been so full it has been a struggle for just me to get to find most of what is there, yesterday I had to look pretty carefully to come up with the list I did. Though it was nice to be there. Previously it has had Hooded Robin, Brown Treecreeper, Diamond Firetail, Leaden Flycatcher, White-browed Woodswallow, none of them left (at least within the area I look at).

 

Good bits were a Tawny Frogmouth on nest with at least one chick in I think exactly the same spot on a tree as last year (or was it 2 years ago?). A pair of kestrels, male seen hunting and female seen flying around a group of trees so presumably nesting in one of them, although the tree they were nesting in 2 years ago has now fallen down. Unlike 2 years ago I was not accosted by a woman who saw me at Kambah Pool and I thought she wanted to know what I was looking at (the above mentioned Tawny Frogmouth on nest) but she saw I was standing still and rushed at me and launched a barrage of preaching Jesus at me. The car park at Kambah Pool on Saturday afternoon was totally full of cars, even along the access road.

 

Otherwise fairly ordinary.

 

Philip

 

 

--
This is the email announcement and discussion list of the Canberra Ornithologists Group.
Emails posted to the list that exceed 2 MB (2,000 kB) in size, including attachments, will be rejected.
All emails distributed via the list are archived at http://bioacoustics.cse.unsw.edu.au/archives/html/canberrabirds. It is a condition of list membership that you agree to your contributions being archived.

Canberrabirds mailing list

https://lists.canberrabirds.org.au/mailman/listinfo/canberrabirds

Attachment: ATT00001.txt
Description: ATT00001.txt

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email . If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU