canberrabirds

Legendary ornithologist - trivial comment

To: 'Mark Clayton' <>, "" <>
Subject: Legendary ornithologist - trivial comment
From: Suzanne EDGAR <>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 09:10:53 +0000

While we’re on  magpies, m ay I venture, ever so hesitantly, to report that 1 of our current gang of 3, a male, has an interesting trick:

He positons himself in a cosy cnr of the kitchen windowsill while I’m preparing dinner inside & it’s growing dark outside; his eyes beg imploringly for more food; but more interestingly, he increases the pressure on me by @ the same time standing on 1 leg; a trick that seems to signal a similar message, in a similar way to that sent by a dog when it sits up on only 2 legs  to beg for food.

Yr humble observer,

Sz

 

From: Suzanne EDGAR [
Sent: Thursday, 22 August 2019 11:33 AM
To: 'Mark Clayton' <>;
Subject: RE: [canberrabirds] Legendary ornithologist - trivial comment

 

I agree with that suggestion

Sz

 

From: Mark Clayton
Sent: Thursday, 22 August 2019 10:45 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [canberrabirds] Legendary ornithologist - trivial comment

 

Philip,

I suggest that in future you thoroughly check what you have written then edit it dramatically before posting it. This is not the first time that many of us remember your somewhat rambling discussions getting somewhat out of hand - this, I believe is what sparked this issue in the first place. You could have found yourself in a somewhat sticky situation if the person you referred to took offence at your remarks.

You are not the only person on the chat line who has put themselves into an awkward situation with over the top comments!

Mark

On 22/08/2019 10:13 am, Philip Veerman wrote:

On 6 May and this week I made a comment against a prominent academic being labelled as a “Legendary ornithologist”. Since then I have researched the word “legend” a bit and find it even more vague and confusing than I had thought, so - in case anyone cares, but hopefully not much, I will clarify. Clearly some have a much wider view of the word than I. My view was that legend is a word best used for someone who is long deceased, whose contribution was immense and whose life is very mysterious, and may indeed not have existed at all. Someone like Robin Hood and King Arthur. If we have a Legendary ornithologist” in Australia at all, I would suggest it may be Gregory Macalister Mathews (1876-1949), who contributed a huge amount but left  big mess, by his rampant bird naming. Or John Gould, maybe even Elizabeth Gould, Or among those still living, maybe John Young for his great contribution and yet his mysteries. Maybe these are our “Legendary ornithologists”.

 

I also wrote “I would not recommend or bother to buy her books”. That comes across probably harsh, so sorry about that aspect. However it is in the (non stated) context that as I have not bought or read this person’s books, it would be inappropriate for me to recommend them. I have quickly looked at them and read some reviews. I now very rarely buy new books unless they are really useful, I have heaps of books about bird behaviour already, I don’t have the funds, time or space to keep buying books whilst I will never have time to read them all anyway and they imposes greatly on my space available.

 

Philip

 

 

Image removed by sender.

Virus-free. www.avg.com

 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email . If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU