Greetings. As List Manager on behalf of COG's Committee of Management, I have found Ryu's contributions about eBird very helpful. I have never thought that anything that he has said suggested that he had any official role in eBird. He is, like many of us, a
keen eBirder and I welcome him sharing his insights with other list members. Since eBird has become the de-facto key data source of COG's records, given that almost all of them now come from that source, information about innovations in eBird is highly apposite
for the CanberraBirds list.
That said, please let's not pursue the topic further. I append the CanberraBirds list rules as a reminder to all subscribers.
Best wishes - David
Canberra Ornithologists Group email lists manager
1004 Norton Road, Wamboin, NSW 2620, Australia
Tel: (02) 6238 3706
Fax: (02) 9475 4274
Mobile: 0416 231 890
The list has a few simple rules that guide its operation. These stress the overarching importance of subscribers treating other list participants with respect and avoiding inappropriate language and behaviour so that participation remains
enjoyable for everyone. It is important that new subscribers, and people new to birding, are made to feel welcome.
Messages sent to the CanberraBirds email list SHOULD NOT
Be of a purely commercial nature.
Contain defamatory, offensive, hurtful or inappropriate language.
Contain personal attacks—discuss the message, do not attack the messenger.
Contain any photographs of identifiable individuals unless they have given their explicit permission for their images to be sent to the list.
Include one-to-one private email conversations, unless all authors of those conversations have given their explicit permission for their emails to be distributed via the list.
Exceed 200 kB in size (this is a courtesy to people accessing the list via mobile devices using plans that have limited and often expensive downloads).
Stray too far from our main topics: the wild birds of the Canberra/ACT region, their habitat & conservation.
Subscribers who fail to comply with these rules will be suspended from the list for a period, or permanently, as determined by COG’s Executive.
COG’s Committee reminds subscribers that COG (as the list owner), as well as the authors of any defamatory messages distributed by the list, could both be found liable in any legal action for defamation.
All emails distributed via the list are archived at
http://bioacoustics.cse.unsw.edu.au/archives/html/canberrabirds . It is a condition of list membership that you agree that emails that you send to the list address for distribution
are publicly available in the archive. Please note that email addresses in the archive’s contents are masked so that they cannot be harvested by spammers and others.
On 19/08/2017 4:01 PM, Ryu Callaway wrote:
A few weeks ago, I was advised of complaints by a number of chatline subscribers on a number of occasions that I have been "masquerading as an official representative of eBird".
Taking that into account, I opted to add a FYI before the title of yesterday's email, and did not comment on my thoughts on the update. I even avoided signing the email off with my name, and yet, am advised multiple people again raised concerns that I was "actively passing myself off as someone having an official capacity and formal affiliation with ebird." It wasn't even ebird specific, being more about the ebird/Clements taxonomy.
Do people complain with concerns the posters are posing as an official whenever Martin or David mention ebird (sorry), or better yet, whenever someone posts a link to an article in the media or to a scientific journal? If someone shares a link to a community consultation of interest to birders and encourages people to comment, are they suddenly representing either the government or COG's views unless they explicitly state otherwise?
I would find it ridiculous if after every message, everyone had to include disclaimers to state their position. It's a public email discussion line. We comment or share stuff for the interest of other subscribers. People express their own views. It's not like I've put in an email signature that connects me to an official ebird role to misguide people. If you don't want to read it, don't, but there are people that appreciate it.
I hope this makes my stance clear. And perhaps, if you're still unsatisfied, tell me directly with a valid reason why I should have to explicitly include a Non-Affiliation Disclaimer to share birding-related content on a birding discussion list rather than complaining to a third party. Otherwise, I will assume everyone is satisfied.
On 18 Aug 2017, at 7:42 pm, Ryu Callaway m("yahoo.co.jp","ryu_is_gr8");"><> wrote:
Changes relevant to australia are summarised in the following article. Nothing major in terms of species level changes though a few additional subspecies entry options
This is the email announcement and discussion list of the Canberra Ornithologists Group.
Emails posted to the list that exceed 200 kB in size, including attachments, will be rejected.
All emails distributed via the list are archived at http://bioacoustics.cse.unsw.edu.au/archives/html/canberrabirds. It is a condition of list membership that you agree to your contributions being archived.
When subscribing or unsubscribing, please insert the word 'Subscribe' or 'Unsubscribe', as applicable, in the email's subject line.
List manager: David McDonald, email m("canberrabirds.org.au","coglists-owner");"><>