|To:||Julie Clark <>|
|Subject:||Re: Ebird - Rating Photos|
|From:||Martin Butterfield <>|
|Date:||Wed, 5 Apr 2017 20:22:22 +0000|
I had read the guidelines (and rated a few of the images) a few weeks back when it was first announced. The issue I have with the guidelines is that they don't explicitly cover what I see as the core purpose of the photograph - showing the distinctive features of the bird.
For example the 5 star rating is applied to a photograph with "...a bird that fills the frame, is sharp and well-lit, has a clean background, and is posed well. " All of those attributes are about the artistic value of the photograph, and are necessary to get a 5 rating but if they don't include the key marks of the bird are not sufficient.
By way of example I'd suggest that
On 5 April 2017 at 22:34, Julie Clark <> wrote:
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Geoffrey's post plus feather ID please, Philip Veerman|
|Next by Date:||FW: [canberrabirds] Re: Ebird - Rating Photos, Geoffrey Dabb|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: Ebird - Rating Photos, Julie Clark|
|Next by Thread:||Re: Ebird - Rating Photos, Philip Veerman|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email . If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: email@example.com.EDU.AU