It is indeed good news, but I fear it is possibly
over optimistic.
I have seen information provided by a State MP to one of
his constituents which suggested 4 zones rather than two. The
two additional zones are ones that need discussions with
traditional owners and a set in which the NPWS will shoot if
there are specific reasons to do so. If the NPA has been
told different to that then there is, unsurprisingly, still
misinformation floating around this issue.
I note also that the NPA release contains welcome words
about assessment of the effectiveness of the processes etc.
The Dunn Review contained words to the effect that while
there were people in the Parks Service able to do this they
didn't have the resources to so do so. Hopefully the
Government will bolster the resources to allow the
assessments.