canberrabirds

new article- mimicry of heterospecific alarm calls by the brown thornbil

To: Robin Hide <>
Subject: new article- mimicry of heterospecific alarm calls by the brown thornbill
From: John Brannan <>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 05:53:00 +1100
Thanks Robin, very interesting. The Blackbird alarm call that the Brown Thornbills in my garden mimic is accurate enough that I certainly can't tell the difference (until they follow it with their own call).
John Brannan

On 5/03/13 8:49 AM, Robin Hide wrote:
Animal Behaviour, Volume 85, Issue 3, March 2013, Pages 593–603

Fidelity of vocal mimicry: identification and accuracy of mimicry of heterospecific alarm calls by the brown thornbill

  • Division of Evolution, Ecology and Genetics, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia

Correspondence: B. Igic, Building 116, Division of Evolution, Ecology and Genetics, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra 0200, Australia.

m("gmail.com","brani.igic");">


Avian vocal mimicry has been studied for decades, but little is known about its function or requirements for accurate imitation. Furthermore, progress is hampered by the difficulty in identifying which vocalizations are indeed mimetic. We tested historical claims of vocal mimicry in the brown thornbill, Acanthiza pusilla, using a combination of human and computer methods to identify mimicry, followed by comparisons of acoustic similarity with model vocalizations. We recorded vocalizations of brown thornbills and sympatric heterospecifics while undisturbed and during mist net capture or the presence of natural or model predators. We then cross-validated human classification of mimicry with computer classification based on spectrographic measurements and spectral cross-correlation. Finally, we quantified the accuracy of the most common imitations. Brown thornbills predominantly imitated alarm calls given by heterospecifics towards aerial predators, which function in these models to provoke immediate flight by receivers. Human and computer-based methods produced consistent results when identifying and classifying mimicry. Mimicked aerial alarms were not perfect imitations of their corresponding model alarms, but did retain specific acoustic properties previously shown to be important for provoking immediate alarm responses. Although less accurate mimicry may reflect physiological constraints, we suggest that mimetic function, perhaps startling predators, only requires mimicry to retain features of model alarms that provoke immediate alarm responses by receivers. Understanding what factors influence the acoustic structure of mimetic vocalizations is essential in understanding the evolution of vocal mimicry, particularly with accumulating evidence that mimetic function does not always require perfect resemblance in other sensory modalities.


Highlights

► We evaluated vocal mimicry in the brown thornbill. ► Brown thornbills predominantly imitated other species' aerial alarm calls. ► Imitations were similar but not identical to corresponding model alarms. ► Inaccurate imitations retained features important for immediate alarm response. ► We suggest alarm calls may not require perfect imitation for function.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email . If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU