Dear Members
The build up to our competition regarding
nominations for our " Me Too" patron has been overwhelming and much,much more
than we anticipated and we more than happy with your response.
After sifting through a humongous list of your
emails, letters and phone calls and may I say "not an inconsiderable amount
monies in the form of donations" which are very helpful in the process of
compiling a short list of names. We've had to differentiate the
difference between the genuine "Me Too" sharers from the "just plain
dobbers" the "common gossips" and of course the snotty little
"Tell Tales". You can imagine the choosing of contenders is very
difficult at times, but I should add that the donations are extremely helpful in
this regard with the larger donations (take note) being really really
good eye catchers. Some people would erroneously call them
bribes but we consider them more like rewards for doing a difficult
job and these "donors" ( Bless their hearts) make it well well
worth it.
The competition hasn't yet
closed so there's still time to get your nominations in before it
closes and of course it would be well worth remembering the all important
substantial "eye catchers".
Treasurer
PS--- It's our pledge that
we will not do shonky counts or dealings without some
sense of guilt and remorse.
PPs- Anyone
suggesting otherwise will be kneecapped!
PPPS- And the answer is NO! to the request
that the Garden Survey Contributors get 2 votes
|