canberrabirds

Re. [canberrabirds] bird ID please & sarcastic replies [SEC=PERSONAL]

To: <>
Subject: Re. [canberrabirds] bird ID please & sarcastic replies [SEC=PERSONAL]
From: "Geoffrey Dabb" <>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:31:18 +1000

Well, here I am, cumudgeonly as usual.  A word of explanation then.

 

I certainly do not criticise the photo.  Better than some of mine, that do not even contain a bird.

 

Being pressed in this pointed and less than friendly manner, I offer two comments about the posting of cryptic photos.  First, such photos, as we have noted many times, are usually cryptic simply because they conceal the very features helpful to identification.  As one photographer said when I pointed out the photo was highly ambiguous, lacking the key feature:  “Well if that had been in the photograph I would have known what it was and wouldn’t have needed to ask you”.  Is this really the game we encourage?  If the list really enjoys puzzling over ambiguous photos I can provide a hundred or so.  Indeed I think such a conversation led to the last issue of my series of ‘Wotsits’.

 

Secondly, many birdwatchers now carry only a camera and no binoculars.  The view of a bird through a camera lens means (a) a bird otherwise in full view is in view only briefly and often not in view at all (b) it is often not in focus (c) relevant information (movement, voice, possibly even the mate) is not noticed.  I am surprised that my suggestion that the bird would have been identified if an effort had been made to see it is regarded as unhelpful, offensive even.  Oh well, I am probably too old to understand what the object of ‘birdwatching’ is these days.  

 

From: [
Sent: Tuesday, 15 September 2009 10:08 AM
To:
Subject: [canberrabirds] Re. [canberrabirds] bird ID please & sarcastic replies [SEC=PERSONAL]

 

Hi Chris

 

This list isn’t the place for sarcastic comments such as the one you received [Grey Fantail -  another case of PWL (Photograph Without Looking)?”], so please ignore it.

 

There are lots of birders on this list who enjoy helping out with photo IDs. As others have pointed out, your bird is indeed a Grey Fantail. Your description also clearly shows you did look at the bird and list other valuable features that birders on this list can use to help with identifications. Grey Fantails are fantastic, energetic little birds that have returned to Canberra in big numbers over the last month (smaller numbers stay through the winter) and are always a pleasure to watch and listen to.

 

There was also a nice adult White-necked Heron hanging around in front of the Cygnus Hide at lunch yesterday. Also worth keeping an eye out for is an immature Brown Goshawk which at present is very fond of perching on the fallen, dead tree outside this hide.

 

Cheers Dan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email . If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU