canberrabirds
|
To: | "COG List" <> |
---|---|
Subject: | Spotted dove eradication [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] |
From: | "Whitworth, Benjamin - BRS" <> |
Date: | Thu, 28 May 2009 19:32:42 +1000 |
It is very important that COG makes a stronger advocacy move very soon over the spotted dove. The committee could do this through the biodiversity working group and Conservation council and to the ACT government and ministers. Although I haven’t been following the Australian pest issue recently, some interesting research that I am aware of from a few years ago, that are basically reviews, all pretty much showed that pest and weed eradication is only possible when population numbers are low and the area is small. This species is clearly showing an exponential increase, and I reckon within 2 years the cost-benefit ratio will be too high for eradication and in any case it will just be impossible to eradicate, so we will just have to manage and control. A quick search of publications and websites that I am aware of are provided below. Mary’s article is pretty interesting because the spotted dove definitely fits her criteria for being a pest species (obviously) and also at this point in time, potentially could fit most of the criteria for possible eradication. This will soon not be the case. I
have also provided links to other relevant research sites that provide more
information, but I am not across them. Benj Whitworth David C. Cunningham, Gemma Woldendorp, Melissa B. Burgess and Simon C. Barry
(2003) Prioritising sleeper weeds
for eradication- Selection of species based on potential impacts on agriculture
and feasibility of eradication, BRS, Canberra “In
this study, we found that the most significant factors influencing the
likelihood of successful eradication are area, number of infestations, ease of
access and propagule longevity.” (pg 4) David Cunningham and Leanne Brown (2006) Some priority agricultural
sleeper weeds for eradication. BRS. Mary Bomford (2003) RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPORT AND
KEEPING OF EXOTIC VERTEBRATES IN “The timing of an eradication attempt in relation to
establishment will also influence the probability of eradication being achieved.
The sooner eradication is attempted after establishment, the higher the chance
of success. Some eradication attempts have been successful on continents where
the attempt was made on a newly established exotic species, when numbers were
still low and the population was restricted to a small area” (pg 11). http://www.feral.org.au/feral_documents/PC12803.pdf
Also see http://www.feral.org.au/content/policy/risk.cfm Other BRS reports can be found at- http://affashop.gov.au/browseshop.asp
ie Quentin Hart, Dr Steve McLeod, Dr Chris Hardy (2005)
Managing G.
Woldendorp & M. Bomford (2004)
Weed eradication: strategies, timeframes & costs. BRS,
Also see Invasive animal CRC website- http://www.invasiveanimals.com/ Eg
Workshop Proceedings: Risk assessment processes for import and keeping of exotic
vertebrates in Also see the Weeds CRC website. http://www.weedscrc.org.au/index_flash.html
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
Previous by Date: | Duck ID [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED], matthew . ms . frawley |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Duck ID, Philip Veerman |
Previous by Thread: | May Notes, Ian Fraser |
Next by Thread: | Bushnell binoculars, Sue Lashko |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email . If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU