canberrabirds

Identifying dependant young bronze-cuckoos -

To:
Subject: Identifying dependant young bronze-cuckoos -
From: Robin Hide <>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:25:59 +1000
At 09:57 AM 15/09/2007, Geoffrey Dabb wrote:
(1)  Naomi Langmore worked on this a few (5?) years ago at Campbell Park,
with particular attention to the HBC/SFW relationship.  She gave a
presentation to COG.


In case COG members haven't seen them, there are two new papers from research by Langmore and colleagues on aspects of Horsfield's bronze-cuckoos breeding in Campbell Park...


Animal Behaviour (2007) Vol. 74, No. 3: Pages 403-412
"The spatial organization and mating system of Horsfield's bronze-cuckoos, Chalcites basalis "

N.E. Langmore, G.J. Adcock and R.M. Kilner'

In theory, liberation from parental care in brood parasites should facilitate polygamous matings by both sexes. We used a combination of mtDNA and microsatellite analysis to reconstruct sibling groups of Horsfield's bronze-cuckoo chicks to infer the mating system of this species. By mapping the distribution of sibling groups we also inferred the breeding ranges and breeding duration of individual cuckoos. Genetic analysis revealed that individual female cuckoos laid distinctive egg types, enabling inclusion of data based on egg morphology. Pairs of Horsfield's bronze-cuckoos occupied exclusive breeding ranges encompassing clusters of host territories. There was a bimodal pattern in the timing and duration of breeding: early-arriving females laid eggs over a period of up to 5 weeks and were then replaced by late-arriving females, which continued laying periodically over at least 2 months. In other brood-parasitic birds polygamy is widespread. By contrast, Horsfield's bronze-cuckoo females were genetically monogamous, and males were either monogamous or sequentially monogamous. Polygamy may be constrained in Horsfield's bronze-cuckoos by the exclusive home ranges of females.
Keywords: brood parasite; Chalcites basalis; egg morphology; Horsfield's bronze-cuckoo; mating system; monogamy; territoriality

and

Animal Behaviour (Article in Press, available online)
Breeding site and host selection by Horsfield's bronze-cuckoos, Chalcites basalis
N.E. Langmore and R.M. Kilner

Cuckoos are faced with a series of reproductive decisions unique to the brood-parasitic lifestyle. Choice of the appropriate host to rear their young requires decision making at three levels. First, selection of a breeding site may take into account host densities in addition to environmental considerations. Second, once they have selected a breeding site, female cuckoos must ensure that they choose the nests of an appropriate host species to rear their young. Third, cuckoos may also choose among individuals of the host species in relation to the likelihood that the host will successfully rear their young. By observation and experiment, we investigated the factors that influenced annual parasitism rates and the mechanisms of host choice in Horsfield's bronze-cuckoos, Chalcites basalis. Parasitism rates varied from 0% to 37% annually, and were influenced by host density and spring rainfall. Despite the availability of several suitable hosts with similar nest sites within the same habitat, over 99% of Horsfield's bronze-cuckoo eggs were laid in superb fairy-wren, Malurus cyaneus, nests, lending strong support to the Host Preference Hypothesis for host choice. Patterns of parasitism were nonrandom with respect to host female age and identity, but we found no evidence that cuckoos preferentially parasitized those individuals that were most likely to successfully rear their young.
Keywords: avian brood parasitism; Chalcites basalis; Horsfield's bronze-cuckoo; maternal effect; habitat imprinting; host density; host partitioning; host preference

Robin Hide

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email . If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU