But can timber workers read? (Strange considering how much timber ends
up as parer - but perhaps they only want it as bum-fodder.)
Anthea Fleming
On 5/03/2014 7:44 PM, Peter Shute wrote:
The no vote is winning by a long way at the moment. Perhaps the timber workers
are too busy being ultimate conservationists to vote.
Peter Shute
Sent from my iPad
On 5 Mar 2014, at 7:40 pm, "Laurie Knight" <> wrote:
There is a link between the conservation estate and the preservation
of wildlife.
The Australian PM is quoted as saying "We don't support, as a
government and as a Coalition, further lockouts of our forests ...We
have quite enough National Parks, we have quite enough locked up
forests already. In fact, in an important respect, we have too much
locked up forest."
There is a poll in the Fairfax media that runs until 9 pm EST, 10 pm
EDST and 7 pm WST where you can note your opinion.
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/no-more-national-parks-as-tony-abbott-pledges-to-support-loggers-as-the-ultimate-conservationists-20140305-345zp.html
_______________________________________________
Birding-Aus mailing list
To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
_______________________________________________
Birding-Aus mailing list
To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
_______________________________________________
Birding-Aus mailing list
To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
|
