birding-aus

Superb Parrot in the news - Conservation Status

To: Birding-Aus <>
Subject: Superb Parrot in the news - Conservation Status
From:
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:05:05 +1000
They must be classifications under one of the State laws, Chris?  Under the 
Federal EPBC Act, the categories of threatened species are:
extinct;
extinct in the wild;
critically endangered;
endangered;
vulnerable;
conservation dependent.

Also, Carl Clifford mentioned the definition of vulnerable under the Federal 
Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 but this legislation no longer exists - 
it was superseded by the EPBC Act.

Info on the status of Superb Parrot may be found here:
http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/publicspecies.pl?taxon_id=738

Regards
Frank Antram

-Original message-----
From: Chris Sanderson 
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 16:19:39 +1000
To: Peter Shute 
Subject: Superb Parrot in the news - Conservation Status

> Hi Peter,
> 
> The order of "seriousness" of classifications is:
> 
> No concern
> Least threatened
> Vulnerable
> Endangered
> Critcally Endangered
> 
> I believe vulnerable is something along the lines of "likely to go extinct
> without active protection of populations and habitat".  Higher
> classifications are more likely to require direct intervention such as
> habitat restoration or captive breeding to avoid extinction.
> 
> Regards,
> Chris
> 
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Peter Shute <> wrote:
> 
> > So is "vulnerable" better or worse than "endangered"?  I was assuming it
> > was better, in which case I would have said it was "facing a high risk of
> > becoming endangered" rather than "extinct".  Their wording makes me think Im
> > wrong, and that it's worse than "endangered".
> >
> > Peter Shute
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:  [mailto:
> >  On Behalf Of 
> > Sent: Tuesday, 12 May 2009 12:50 PM
> > To: michael norris; Birding-Aus
> > Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Superb Parrot in the news - Conservation Status
> >
> > The definition of 'vulnerable' under the EPBC Act is in Sub-section 179 (5)
> >        A native species is eligible to be included in the vulnerable
> > category at a particular time if, at that time:
> >        (a)     it is not critically endangered or endangered; and
> >        (b)     it is facing a high risk of extinction in the wild in the
> > medium term future, as determined in accordance with the prescribed
> > criteria.
> >
> > The prescribed criteria are in Regulation 7.01.  Links to the Act and the
> > Regulations may be found here
> > http://www.environment.gov.au/epbc/about/index.html
> >
> > Regards
> > Frank Antram
> >
> > -----Original message-----
> > From: "michael norris" 
> > Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 09:17:58 +1000
> > To: "Birding-Aus" 
> > Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Superb Parrot in the news - Conservation Status
> >
> > > What does 'Vulnerable' mean these days?
> > >
> > > Please, someone, give us the precise definitions of the status of
> > > threatened species in the EPBC Act or the URL for the orders which
> > > contain the criteria.
> > >
> > > Best wishes
> > >
> > > Michael Norris
> > >
> > > 37° 59' S  145° 0' E
> > >



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU