The reference I quoted earlier (
http://www.worldbirdnames.org/rules-caps.html) specifically makes the point
that they are treating birds as a "special case" and that other animals
normally have lower case names. I am not sufficiently across other
publications to know whether this is true or not, but surely confusing
statements such as the one you have made could be just as easily applied to
some other animals - in which case one wonders how authors overcome the
problem?
On 30/12/2007, Neil Cheshire <> wrote:
>
> Richard,
>
> The contagion of lower case for bird names has unfortunately spread from
> American scientific journals in
> recent years. The passage below perhaps illustrates the problem with this
> approach.
>
> " When the group arrived at the lake a little egret was seen and a few
> minutes later a larger egret flew in.
> Later a singing honeyeater was heard but this became inaudible when a
> noisy miner appeared."
>
> Somewhat inconsistently they retain capitals for a personal or
> geographical element of a bird name.
>
> Neil Cheshire
>
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to:
>
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
===============================
|
