...and New Zealand?
 You are right though, it is up to the individual, although how does one 
define an (or the) "official" list? The official list would be best served 
as probably two different lists.
One being an Australian continental list, excluding areas not 
(bio)geographically connected to Australia. The second would include 
political outliers etc (and would exclude emabassies of course), this being 
the current definition used. Two lists.
 I think this would make the whole listing exercise more fun, with more 
emphasis on finding birds such as Scarlet-chested Parrots or Letter-winged 
Kites etc. Vagrant birds would include those that turn up in Australia, not 
vagrant birds that turn up on the territorial islands only. The 200 NM limit 
could still be used for ocean birds, or simply what could be seen from the 
edge of the continental shelf. I don't know. Maybe some people with lists 
already have such a separation in their lists?
What do people think of this?
 
From: "JohnPenhallurick" <>
To: "Tom Johnson" <>,<>
Subject: Re: [BIRDING-AUS] Lists
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:29:45 +1100
Individuals, of course, are free to define lists any way they wish, but I
 think it is farcical to include Christmas island, Cocos-Keeling Islands, 
and
Macquarie Island in the Australian List. This flies in the face of any
notion of biogeography, and you might as well include the grounds of every
Australian embassy!
The rest of the birding world includes Christmas Island and Cocas-Keeling
Islands in an Indian Ocean List.
If you want a bigger target, then you can go for Australasia and include
PNG.
John
 
 
_________________________________________________________________
 It's easy to send photos with Hotmail. Click here to find out how:  
http://www.imagine-msn.com/Hotmail/Post/Communicate/SendPhotos.aspx
--------------------------------------------
Birding-Aus is now on the Web at
www.birding-aus.org
--------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message 'unsubscribe
birding-aus' (no quotes, no Subject line)
to 
 
 |