Atsugi city apologies for OZ Embassy about little tern report

To: birding-aus <>
Subject: Atsugi city apologies for OZ Embassy about little tern report
From: Tom Tarrant <>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 15:17:35 +1000
Hi All,
Apologies for cross-posting, but just saw this message on the
Orientalbirding Mailing-list and thought it might interest
unfortunately it is probably the most illegible statement I've ever
read.....I think I would have understood it better in Japanese!
Translations welcomed.

Date:  Thu Aug 22, 2002  1:07 pm
               Subject:  Atsugi city apologies for OZ Embassy about
little tern report

               According to Asahi Shimbun on 22 August,2002, Atsugi city
               forAustralian Embassy about little tern report as

               Hiroshi Takada
               Atsugi City Councillor

               Atsugi city which receives inquiry from the Australian
embassy concerning
               Little Tern nest building area nearby road construction
plan, " as for the
               specialist have assumed there is no influence in nest
building area, " with
               the problem which does the reply which differs from fact,
city recognizing
               error, decided that it does the correction report of the
exceptional case
               which recognizes influence in the same embassy on the
23rd August,2002
               . The staff staff going to the embassy directly, you say
apology it does. As
               for this problem concerning the Sagami river dike road
construction plan of
               city, the Australian embassy in May influence and the
like to nest building
               area asking is beginning. It gave an advise listened city
from the
               specialist. As for the specialist as for the influence
with construction
               itself it is not, but when traffic of the person and the
car increases with
               completion of the road, assuming there is a possibility
of producing effect
               it pointed out the necessity of measure. But, as for city
" especially
               influence received the opinion that it is not, " it
replied in the embassy.
               Receiving reporting which pointed out this problem, city
side as greatly
               report to the side explains the fact that " it is less
than word " in the
               specialist who inquires about opinion, you promised the
fact that the new
               report which corrected contents is transferred to the
embassy. According to
               city, in the new report, the point where it is pointed
out that with
               inclusion of the person with the completion of the road
also hindrance can
               be in habitat of the Little Tern express statement
conversion. " Last time
               influence there is no ", as for doing, you say it makes
that it is something
               which is expressed only the influence of construction
itself clear. The city
               public relations office " in the future is great, we
would like to maintain
               the relationship which can be discussed with side
securely. It recognizes
               the fact that the previous report is less than word even
because of that,
               apology wants " it has done.

Tom and Marie Tarrant
Lot 10 (137) Watson Rd
Queensland 4520


Birding-Aus is on the Web at
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message
"unsubscribe birding-aus" (no quotes, no Subject line)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU