birding-aus

House Crow and ship assists

To: "Andrew Stafford" <>
Subject: House Crow and ship assists
From: "Dion Hobcroft" <>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 17:50:19 +1100
Andrew,

you cannot tick ship assists, aviary escapes, dead birds or birds held in
rehabilitation-human captivity. These are the basic conventions of a healthy
list.

Christidis and Boles is the working list for Australia. Clements covers the
world. Following these conventions House Crow does not qualify for the
Australian list. The supplementary list is for such unqualified species.

Always there will be suspected ship assists and escapes so committees such
as BARC need to make decisions. If species are long distance migrants like
Sabine's and Franklin's Gulls or Blue Rock Thrush or Red-throated Pipit
maybe you can rest assured they flew at least most of the way themselves.

It gets greyer with short distance movement species such as Laughing and
Black-tailed Gull. Currently they are considered to be on the list.

House Crows typically present as definite ship assists possible-probable
escapees. Was the reported dark grey cowl of the Phillip Island bird an
indicator of juvenile plumage or geographical variation?

As one Newcastle birder exclaimed- "two wings, no rings, I saw it and it was
one-on the list!"

Happy listing

Dion



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU