|To:||Birding-Aus Mail <>|
|Date:||Fri, 06 Oct 2000 09:12:45 +1000|
This is just me letting off steam about a conservation/resource issue that is not directly related to (though very important to) birds, so delete now if you're not interested.
I heard a story on ABC Radio this morning about the on-going argument about re-allocating flow to the Snowy River to restore it's health. Note well that the Snowy was diverted to ultimately flow into the Murray. Under this regime, the Snowy is said to be dying. Anyway, someone was commenting that increasing flows in the Snowy (i.e. its original course) to levels above 15% of original flow would have serious implications for electricity generation, irrigation and the health of the Murray-Darling system.
What a telling comment! Accepting that figure at face value, it appears that the health of the largest river system in Australia now depends on diversion of at least 85% of the flow of a river that never was a part of the catchment. A sad reflection of the abuse to which we've subjected the Murray, isn't it?
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Colour banding birds, David Geering|
|Next by Date:||Re. anonymity on birding-aus, Chris Tzaros|
|Previous by Thread:||Colour banding birds, David Geering|
|Next by Thread:||Snowy River, Peter Waanders|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: email@example.com.EDU.AU