[Top] [All Lists]

Re: low-cost hydrophones suggestions

Subject: Re: low-cost hydrophones suggestions
From: "" <>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 14:25:56 +0200

Dear all,
thanks for your answers so far.
I realize I should have detailed more what our intentions 
and expectations are, what is the other equipment involved 

All this operation has not nor doesn't pretend a strictly
scientific approach+result. 

Our aim is to record underwater fauna activity in relatively
small lakes and ponds.

The recording device we are using is a mere Tascam DR100 that
delivers 48V phantom power and ideally we'd like to avoid 
hydrophones needing an additional preamp.

We already experimented with cheap and handmade solutions,
like piezoelectric transducers, with often quite nice results
(well, for our application anyway...)

Here's an example of what we have recorded with some piezo
underwater mics:
(by the way, I've no idea of what's that... could someone tell
me please?)
That was recorded in a pond. Using the same piezos in a lake,
nothing like that was picked up, all was silent (except some 
far away motorized boats).

So, do you think investing in some low-cost hydrophones we
may achieve better results than the example above? Will it
allow to record some more details?

Many thanks

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Bioacoustics-L mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU