bioacoustics-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Bioacoustic articles: Behaviour 140 (1)

To:
Subject: Bioacoustic articles: Behaviour 140 (1)
From: Reeflab <>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 09:23:13 -0800
<a  
href="http://antonio.ingentaselect.com/vl=2910588/cl=12/nw=1/rpsv/cw/brill/0005795";
 
rel="nofollow">http://antonio.ingentaselect.com/vl=2910588/cl=12/nw=1/rpsv/cw/brill/0005795</a>
 9/contp1.htm
 
 Find abstracts below.
 
 M. D. Greenfield and W. A. Snedden. 2003. Selective attention and the
 spatio-temporal structure of orthopteran chorouses. Behaviour 140 (1): 1-26.
 
 H. Brumm and D. Todt. 2003. Facing the rival: directional singing behaviour
 in nightingales. Behaviour 140 (1): 43-53.
 
 T. J. Hammond and W. J. Bailey. 2003. Eavesdropping and defensive auditory
 maskink in an Australian bushcricket, Caedicia (Phaneropterinae:
 Tettigoniidae: Orthoptera). Behaviour 140 (1): 79-95.
 
 R. Márquez and J. Bosch. 2003. Temporal encoding of information in the
 advertisement call of the Iberian midwife toad (Alytes cisternasii). The
 importance of rise time. Behaviour 140 (1): 113-123.
 _______________________________________________
 
 Abstracts:
 
 M. D. Greenfield and W. A. Snedden. 2003. Selective attention and the
 spatio-temporal structure of orthopteran chorouses. Behaviour 140 (1): 1-26.
 Abstract: Temporally structured choruses in which neighbouring males
 alternate or synchronize their calls are common among rhythmically singing
 Orthoptera. In many cases, chorusing appears to be driven ultimately by
 psychoacoustic precedence effects that influence females to orient toward
 leading male calls and to ignore males whose call onsets follow their
 neighbours' onsets by a critical interval, 0-70 msec in some species but as
 long as 0.2-2.0 sec in others. When such preferences occur, call timing
 mechanisms with which males reduce their production of following calls are
 favored by selection. These timing mechanisms are observed among
 rhythmically calling species, and they may generate the emergence of group
 synchrony or alternation as a byproduct of local pairwise signal
 interactions.
 Where males are selected to adjust call timing and increase their incidence
 of leading calls, they confront a dilemma if density is high: Adjusting call
 rhythm in response to all singing neighbours may severely reduce the calling
 rate, whereas forgoing rhythm adjustment may lead to a preponderance of
 ineffective following calls. Simulations and laboratory experiments
 demonstrate that calling males may solve this problem by selectively
 attending to only a subset of neighbours.
 We studied three orthopteran species, Ligurotettix planum, Ephippiger
 ephippiger (both alternating chorusers), and Neoconocephalus spiza
 (synchronous choruser), in the field to determine the extent to which
 selective attention occurs in natural populations and structures chorusing.
 These three species were chosen because previous studies demonstrated
 moderate to strong precedence effects in females and timing adjustments in
 males with which they reduced production of following calls; moreover,
 controlled experiments indicated that selective attention influenced
 interactions among calling males in one of the species. As predicted, our
 studies of natural choruses showed that males in all three species
 maintained high call rates by attending to only some of their neighbours.
 Attended neighbours were generally the nearest, and loudest, ones, but other
 rules with which attention is applied may also occur. In L. planum and E.
 ephippiger, males generally attended to a single calling neighbour, but N.
 spiza males often attended to several. We propose that reduced selectivity
 in N. spiza reflects the synchronous nature of its chorusing, implying that
 a group effect emerging incidentally can influence via feedback the
 individual behaviour yielding that collective activity.
 
 H. Brumm and D. Todt. 2003. Facing the rival: directional singing behaviour
 in nightingales. Behaviour 140 (1): 43-53.
 Abstract: Many animal vocalizations are directional, i.e. the sound energy
 is not emitted omnidirectionally but focused in one direction. Such signal
 property could be advantageous in order to direct the vocalization towards
 the addressee, provided its position is known to the sender. On the other
 hand, a directional signal could be disadvantageous when the position of
 addressees is not known. Thus, some animals may adjust their behaviour to
 either counteract or exploit the directionality of their vocalizations
 depending on the context of communication. We tested this hypotheses in
 territorial male nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos) demonstrating the
 behavioural significance of vocal directionality for the first time. While
 interacting with the playback of a rival, the birds increased the strength
 of singing directionality by orientating themselves towards the playback
 loudspeaker. At the same time, subjects showed less lateral head movements
 per song during the playback procedure suggesting that nightingales mitigate
 the directional sound radiation pattern of their songs and emit them in a
 more omnidirectional way when the position of potential addressees is
 unclear. During interactions, however, when the position of a addressee is
 detected, the birds use the directionality of their songs to broadcast them
 in the direction of the addressee ensuring the most effective signal
 transmission.
 
 T. J. Hammond and W. J. Bailey. 2003. Eavesdropping and defensive auditory
 maskink in an Australian bushcricket, Caedicia (Phaneropterinae:
 Tettigoniidae: Orthoptera). Behaviour 140 (1): 79-95.
 Abstract: We investigated the potential for a novel alternative male tactic
 in Caedicia, an Australian genus of duetting phaneropterine bushcrickets
 (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Phaneropterinae). Males listen to and track
 females as they reply to the calls of other males, using both the male call
 and the female reply to initiate their own searching behaviour. We describe
 this behaviour as eavesdropping. Calling males produce a high intensity
 chirp following their calling song, which has no apparent effect on female
 responsiveness. We test the possibility that this loud chirp acts to defend
 the temporary pair bond, established between the calling male and the
 duetting female, by preventing other males from hearing the female reply. We
 suggest means by which the calling male may be able to hear the female reply
 whilst producing the masking chirp. This behaviour may be considered a form
 of pre-copulatory acoustic mate guarding.
 
 R. Márquez and J. Bosch. 2003. Temporal encoding of information in the
 advertisement call of the Iberian midwife toad (Alytes cisternasii). The
 importance of rise time. Behaviour 140 (1): 113-123.
 Abstract: In order to test the relative importance of the beginning (rise
 time) and end of the advertisement call in call localization and call
 preference with female Iberian midwife toads we performed two-speaker
 playback experiments with synthetic stimuli. In the first set of tests the
 alternative stimuli were the initial (rise time) or the final part (fall
 time) of a male call (abutting, or antiphonally). In the second set of
 tests, two alternative calls were presented differing in the dominant
 frequency of the initial part of the call or the final part of the call.
 In the first set of tests, the preferred stimulus was always the first one
 presented, independently of the shape of the rise time, which seemed to be
 unimportant for female choice. The second set of tests did not yield a
 conclusive answer about the relative importance of the rise time of the call
 but suggest that further studies of this possibility may prove fruitful.
 _________________________________
 
 Dr.  F R A N K    V E I T
 Int. Laboratory for Dolphin Behaviour Research
 c/o Dolphin Reef Eilat, Southern Beach
 P.O.Box 104, Eilat 88100, Israel
 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Tel.: +972 - 8 - 6341 868
 Fax: +972 - 8 - 6375 921
 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Bioacoustic articles: Behaviour 140 (1), Reeflab <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Bioacoustics-L mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU