birding-aus

Birdline Western Australia Weekly Update GREAT SHEARWATER

To: <>, <>, <>, <>, <>
Subject: Birdline Western Australia Weekly Update GREAT SHEARWATER
From: Tim Jones <>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 23:31:42 +0000
Hear hear
 

> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:24:19 -0700
> From: 
> To: ; ; ; 
> 
> CC: ; 
> Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Birdline Western Australia Weekly Update GREAT 
> SHEARWATER
> 
> "Never let the truth get in the way of a good story" is generally attributed 
> to Mark Twain. It's a fine sentiment when you're telling a ripping yarn after 
> dinner or propping up the front bar. However, it just doesn't translate into 
> birding. 
>  
> Everyone makes mistakes. Anybody can misidentify a bird and everybody who 
> tries to identify them will get them wrong sometimes. I've made plenty of bad 
> calls on birds. I've seen better birders than me stuff it up completely. And 
> I've seen plenty of feisty debates, often never to be resolved. Some birders 
> are more prone than others to making up their mind on the spot and refusing 
> to consider alternatives. Some are pleased to be corrected when appropriate. 
> What matters is getting the record straight so that everyone knows what is 
> fact, what is fiction, and what is unresolved. Sometimes egos get bruised, 
> which is not the best part of what we do. Fora like Birding-Aus and Eremea 
> are excellent for getting information out quickly and helping birders see 
> lots of good birds that they never would have heard about in days gone by. So 
> thank you to the moderators all over Australia for all the volunteer work 
> that you do for the birding community.  But the reports
> circulated in these fora are not vetted and not confirmed. Most are correct, 
> but a percentage are wrong. That is how it works. In this case the record has 
> been vetted publicly and the record has been set straight. There are other 
> ways of vetting records. However, this is an example of the birding community 
> working together to document birds, help the observer know they likely saw, 
> and keep the literature that little bit cleaner of errors. We learn and move 
> on. Good stuff. 
>  
> Andrew, you did the right thing, gave your honest opinion and made it 
> available to all of us. I hope this conversation has not given you any 
> regrets, because you need have none.  Welcome to the Australian birding 
> community!
>  
> David James, 
> Sydney
> 
> ==============================
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: martin cachard <>
> To: ; ; jeff davies 
> <> 
> Cc: birding-aus threads <>;  
> Sent: Tuesday, 20 March 2012 12:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Birdline Western Australia Weekly Update GREAT 
> SHEARWATER CLEARLY NOT
> 
> 
> Hi Nikolas, Andrew & all No Nik, you weren't the smart arse on this one - 
> maybe it was me.  I was very quick to say the Speckled Warbler wasn't one, 
> but that it was a young Rufous Whistler. I was also quickly agreeing with you 
> & Mike Carter that the Great Shearwater that Andrew saw & thought was a Great 
> Shearwater, was indeed a young Aust Gannet. I left the tern ID alone - but 
> yes I do agree, 1st yr Common Tern... So maybe it is me that should apologise 
> for being so fast to question these sightings... rightly or wrongly... But I 
> feel the bigger evil is when one takes a veiled swipe, & that wasn't me or 
> yourself, Nik, so that person is the one who should apologise, not you or 
> me... Cheers for now,  Martin Cachard  Cairns  0428 782 808  
> > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 02:15:31 -0700
> > From: 
> > To: ; 
> > CC: ; 
> > Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Birdline Western Australia Weekly Update GREAT   
> >  SHEARWATER CLEARLY NOT
> > 
> > Hi Andrew and Philip,
> > 
> > Andrew, first I would like to apologize to you that I opened this can of 
> > worms with my first e-mail questioning your sighting. Since you mentioned 
> > that you were familiar with Manx Shearwater, I am sure that you were 
> > familiar with Northern Gannets, too. On the other hand your description 
> > fits best an immature gannet - on this side of the world most likely an 
> > Australasian Gannet. In this case (until proven otherwise) it was important 
> > to have the note removed from Eremaea to not confuse future searches for 
> > Great Shearwater. I definitely don't want to scare you off. Please continue 
> > to report your sightings, Andrew.
> > 
> > 
> > Philip, I strongly disagree with your small leaps. They happen all too 
> > often and are wrong. I have been member of a number of rare bird committees 
> > on various continents. I often noticed that submitters don't consider the 
> > unusual. E.g. to me a report of a Bridled Tern clearly ruling out a Sooty 
> > Tern, doesn't mean that the bird was a Bridled Tern unless you also rule 
> > out a Spectacled/Grey-backed Tern (even though it is not [yet] on the 
> > Australian list). Another story is that of an adult male Lark Bunting 
> > reported to us when I was part of the New Jersey Rare Birds Committee. Lark 
> > Bunting is the only black finch-like bird in North American field guides 
> > but still highly unlikely in New Jersey. The photos proved it to be one of 
> > the African widow finches - obviously an escapee. Therefore in order to 
> > prove the small leap you have to make a big leap.
> > 
> > 
> > Often, once you are on the wrong track, you may get lost. So I guess, if 
> > you misidentify a gannet for a shearwater and you still notice its huge 
> > size, why not think of a Great [sic!] Shearwater or another large 
> > shearwater species? Therefore, I totally understand this thought - even 
> > without wishful thinking involved. Funny things do happen: I know someone 
> > whose name begins with "N" and ends with "ikolas" (no, it wasn't David 
> > James!) who screamed "Streaked Shearwater". This bird turned out to be the 
> > most gigantic shearwater I've ever seen with a wing span of 3.5 metres! It 
> > turned out to be a Wandering Albatross! Sh.. happens.
> > 
> > 
> > And yes, most - if not all - shearwaters dive, but to my knowledge and 
> > experience not in the way Andrew described it.
> > 
> > Finally, yes (1) the mystery tern was a Common Tern moulting from first 
> > winter to first summer plumage (note the seasons refer to the northern 
> > hemisphere) and (2) the mystery little speckled bird was a juv Rufous 
> > Whistler. I just didn't want to be the smart arse again - but I guess I am 
> > ;-)
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Nikolas
> > 
> >  
> > ----------------
> > Nikolas Haass
> > 
> > Sydney, NSW
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> >  From: Philip Veerman <>
> > To: 'Jeff Davies' <> 
> > Cc: ;  
> > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 7:37 PM
> > Subject: [Birding-Aus] Birdline Western Australia Weekly Update GREAT 
> > SHEARWATER CLEARLY NOT
> >  
> > Hi Jeff,
> > 
> > Thanks for your comment. Sorry if you or others think so, I wasn't intending
> > "way overkill". I am curious at the general phenomenon (not just this case)
> > of people making big leaps of identification, rather than small leaps and
> > wondering why this sort of thing happens somewhat often. A very long time
> > ago (20 to 30 years) when I was seasick on a pelagic trip, I looked up at
> > something, probably not very clearly, and thought I had seen a distant
> > Wandering Albatross, because it was mainly white above, but that thought
> > only lasted a few minutes. No doubt it was an adult Gannet. So why did I
> > want it to be a Wandering Albatross, simply because I wanted it! But that is
> > a species you could reasonably expect to have encountered at that place and
> > date. 
> > 
> > It is interesting why would an identification go to that particular species
> > (Great Shearwater) which is unlikely just on status. I understand a new
> > birder to our shores learning the ropes thinking what a great bird. But
> > curious as to the thought process. Could it be because it has been mentioned
> > recently? As in my question is about the role of wishful thinking in bird
> > identification over the whole range of people and experiences. I don't see
> > this as rubbing it in. 
> > 
> > And yes you are right that Great Shearwater is not ONLY "on the other side
> > of the world" (but usually is).
> > 
> > Lastly the question remains: Do any shearwaters feed by diving behaviour as
> > described? 
> > 
> > Philip
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----From: Jeff Davies 
> > Sent: Monday, 19 March 2012 2:35 PM
> > To: 'Philip Veerman';     Cc: 
> > 
> > Subject: RE: [Birding-Aus] Birdline Western Australia Weekly Update GREAT
> > SHEARWATER CLEARLY NOT
> > 
> > 
> > This is way overkill Philip, 
> > 
> > it was an honest mistake by Andrew McKey a new birder to our shores learning
> > the ropes, who was brave enough to put up a report for scrutiny. 
> > Should have been picked up by the forum administrators before going to air,
> > but has now been corrected by a couple of observant forum readers as a
> > perfect description for a young Gannet. Reports of late demonstrate clearly
> > that Great Shearwater is not only "on the other side of the world" and this
> > probably resonated with Andrew.
> > 
> > So why rub it in, cheers Jeff.
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----From: 
> >  On Behalf Of Philip Veerman
> > Sent: Monday, 19 March 2012 2:08 PM    To:     Cc:
> >     Subject: [Birding-Aus] Birdline Western Australia
> > Weekly Update GREAT SHEARWATER CLEARLY NOT
> > 
> > Sure we can make mistakes on confusing difficult species but I am amused by
> > this one, not at the making a mistake. I can understand someone saying I
> > don't know what it is but why come up with an idea of Great Shearwater? I
> > don't find it in my Aussie field guides, so why would that be in the mix of
> > ideas? Indeed Peter Harrison's Seabirds book shows Great Shearwater on the
> > opposite side of the world. Looking at the pictures of Great Shearwater in
> > that book does not raise images to me of similarity to a gannet. Gannet do
> > occur in UK. I think Michael Palin said he didn't like a British bird book
> > because it had the Gannet in it. 
> > 
> > Lastly, now I am curious. Do any shearwaters feed by diving behaviour as
> > described? I have not seen it. 
> > 
> > Philip
> > 
> > ===============================
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> > send the message:
> > unsubscribe
> > (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> > to: 
> > 
> > http://birding-aus.org
> > ===============================
> > ===============================
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> > send the message:
> > unsubscribe
> > (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> > to: 
> > 
> > http://birding-aus.org
> > ===============================
>                         
> ===============================
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: 
> 
> http://birding-aus.org
> ===============================
> ===============================
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: 
> 
> http://birding-aus.org
> ===============================
                                          
===============================

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 

http://birding-aus.org
===============================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU