Paying to Enrich our Experience

To: <>
Subject: Paying to Enrich our Experience
From: Graeme Stevens <>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:19:24 +1000
For all those on the list who are bored to death with this topic, offended by 
some of the posts, or just want to get back to birding, I humbly apologise.

I dont post all that often, but have watched the debate go to and fro and just 
cannot sit on my hands any longer. Maybe it comes from some necessary 
involvement in ethics in my career - forgive the affliction, I dont think it 
can be cured.

My (I hope) objective view is that nearly everyone is right - from their 
perspective - and I would hate to see acrimony or wrong thinking get in the way 
of our collective passion for the outdoors and its winged inhabitants.

The problem surely is not:

That we are blessed in Australia with fantastic opportunities to see 
significant biodiversity in interesting places - and therefore that somehow 
makes arrangements we make for our birding adventures "different".
That commercial operators are entitled to make a profit (it's what they do for 
a living!) - most are terrifc, good on 'em and we make our choices based on 
cost, quality and references and we have better opportunities as a result. May 
their businesses thrive to show more people the wonders available.
That many people devote time, effort and great passion in helping us all expand 
our horizons - we are grateful to them for that. They are entitled to cover 
their costs for doing so
That we are discussing a one day pelagic with burley, a trip to Cocos or a 
drive down the Canning Stock Route - that's just an issue of scale.
That we are all enriched by the presence of mentors, guides and experience at 
various points in our birding journeys.

The problem surely is:

That sensible and appropriate honesty, ethics and transparency should go with 
any commercial transaction if we have a modicum of common sense and wish to 
have trouble free enjoyment.

Sadly, it is easy for doubt to creep in if we dont, so why not just spell it 
out nice and clear up front. It's just a sensible thing to do.

We are probably no different to any large slice of the population and there 
will be a very tiny percentage of our number who may try it on, or be just a 
little cute,  so why do we not just expect a standard which prevents it? 
There's no point all you fabulous and generous people getting a bit hurt and 
justifying your personal efforts and contributions. In most cases we know, 
love, respect and appreciate you for doing it.

As I read it, you weren't the subject of the original post.

Best Regards

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU