birding-aus

Great vs Intermediate Egret

To: "peter crow" <>, "Roger Giller" <>
Subject: Great vs Intermediate Egret
From: "Peter Shute" <>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 15:29:22 +1000
>From memory, even the picture in S&D doesn't show the extended gape.
Can anyone confirm that?

Peter Shute

 wrote on Wednesday, 21 May 2008 2:01
PM:

> Maybe that's why I prefer NOT to use Simpson and Day.
>
> Peter
>
>
> On 21/05/2008, at 10:36 AM, Roger Giller wrote:
>
>> Peter,
>> My field guide, Simpson and Day 7th edition, makes no mention of
>> the gape as a distinguishing feature. They refer mainly to the
>> "flatter' forehead of the Great vs. Intermediate, the longer neck
>> to body ratio, and the relatively longer, more slender bill of the
>> Great. Regards.
==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
=============================
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU