birding-aus

RE: White Ibis studies in Sydney Region (David Berg)

To:
Subject: RE: White Ibis studies in Sydney Region (David Berg)
From: "Natalia Atkins" <>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:45:41 +1000
That story about killing ibis eggs is so sad!  Whats wrong with people?


>
>   6. RE: White Ibis studies in Sydney Region (David Berg)
>
>
>
> know by reply e-mail, delete it from your system and destroy any copies.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:44:27 +1100 (EST)
> From: David Berg <>
> Subject: RE: [Birding-Aus] White Ibis studies in Sydney Region
> To: storm <>, 
> Message-ID: <>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> I agree, one of the sickest items of cruelty to animals I've read in a
> while. And its carried out by government bodies that should be looking after
> native species. Ibises for ever!
>
>  Dave Berg
>
> storm <> wrote:
>  Alan, Greg
>
> It's reports like this that make the general public think it's ok to
> rubbish
> Ibis. This is about a 'humane' way to kill off the eggs of an 'aggressive'
> species. I can't think of anything more aggressive than a species that
> will
> kill off another's young.
>
> http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/10/11/2056320.htm
>
> The Australian ibis, with its white body plumage, black head and neck and
> long curved bill, is a common bird in north and east Australia and more
> often than not, it is near a rubbish bin near you.
>
> The reason for that is that its usual feeding and breeding areas in the
> western wetlands have dried out.
>
> But researchers have found a way they say that is 100 per cent effective
> in
> controlling the nuisance species and it involves common cooking oil, but
> not
> a cooking pot, thankfully.
>
> The same method can be applied to other bird pests like starlings, pigeons
> and Indian mynas.
>
> Sydney's Centennial Park is a swathe of green in the heart of the city but
> at the moment it is also a hot bed of hormones.
>
> On a small island in the middle of one of the park's lakes, several
> hundred
> ibis are busy attracting a mate.
>
> They are honking and lifting their wings to reveal a red streak, a sign
> that
> the bird is ready to breed.
>
> Professor Joan Dawes is from Pestat, a group that develops ways to control
> pest species.
>
> She first came across egg oiling in the United States during a visit to
> the
> Department of Agriculture.
>
> The Americans had just finished trials using everyday cooking oil to coat
> the eggs of Canada geese and seagulls.
>
> The idea is that the baby bird is starved of oxygen inside the egg and the
> egg never hatches.
>
> "They're quite big and quite aggressive birds. They'll eat anything at all
> and they'll also just walk up to little kids and take a sandwich or an
> ice-cream out of their hands and probably peck them in the process," she
> said.
>
> "So it was a particularly easy, cheap, simple process and I thought that
> it
> might be worth trying here in Australia."
>
> John Martin is one of the park rangers in Sydney's Centennial Park and he
> has had a 100 per cent success rate on his first trial of egg oiling.
>
> Birds nesting on one island in the park had their eggs sprayed with the
> oil
> and none of them hatched.
>
> The birds also did not return to that island for the next breeding season.
>
> "The common technique used is nest and egg destruction and when you do
> that
> the birds - what we've observed is that ibis commonly just re-nest," he
> said.
>
> "So it's a lot of effort for them to build another nest and then lay
> another
> clutch of eggs, so with the oiling technique it actually stops them from
> laying another clutch of eggs.
>
> "They continue to incubate the eggs which they've already laid, but
> they're
> not going to hatch."
>
> Professor Dawes says the only thing that can be concluded is that as a
> social, nesting species they communicate with each other.
>
> "Word got out that this was not a good place to nest and that they weren't
> going to rear young if they did nest there," she said.
>
> But it seems that warning message was only passed on among ibis, not other
> bird species.
>
> On the trial island, cormorants are now breeding in fig trees and a
> camphor
> laurel tree 20 metres above where the ibis had their eggs oiled.
>
> The researchers also say egg oiling may be a cheap and effective way for
> city councils to eradicate problem birds like the ibis and potentially
> starlings and pigeons.
>
> "One of the advantages of this is that it's a food oil and so there are
> absolutely no health or safety or environmental consequences to its use,"
> Professor Dawes said.
>
> "You could just go to the supermarket and buy the canola oil and use
> that."
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
>  Behalf Of Gregory Little
> Sent: Thursday, 10 January 2008 4:38 PM
> To: 'alan morris'; 
> Subject: RE: [Birding-Aus] White Ibis studies in Sydney Region
>
>
> Gooday Alan and all
>
> Just as an aside re Ibis, I was recently out on a daily walk along the
> back of Maryland on the edge of Hexham Swamp (near Newcastle, NSW) and
> as I passed a fellow walker I commented on how good it was to see the
> White Ibis nesting in a patch of nearby Paperbarks. He answered very
> shortly "that they are a pest and steal food and bother people". I
> assumed he meant those Ibis in Sydney at the Zoo and Hyde Park etc.
>
> Greg Little
>
> Greg Little - Principal Consultant
> General Flora and Fauna
> PO Box 526
> Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia
> Ph 02 49 556609
> Fx 02 49 556671
> www.gff.com.au
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
>  On Behalf Of alan morris
> Sent: Thursday, 10 January 2008 4:17 PM
> To: 
> Subject: [Birding-Aus] White Ibis studies in Sydney Region
>
> Hi Birders,
> Can anyone tell me who to contact in respect to the colour-banding
> project
> of breeding White Ibis in the Sydney region?
>
> A contact of mine has been recording band numbers and colours, and
> wants to
> know to whom he should pass on the details?
>
> Alan Morris
>
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: 
> ===============================
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.0/1216 - Release Date:
> 9/01/2008 10:16 AM
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.0/1216 - Release Date:
> 9/01/2008 10:16 AM
>
>
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: 
> ===============================
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.0/1216 - Release Date:
> 09/01/2008
> 10:16 AM
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.0/1216 - Release Date:
> 09/01/2008
> 10:16 AM
>
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: 
> ===============================
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Make the switch to the world's best email. Get the new Yahoo!7 Mail now.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:14:27 +1100
> From: 
> Subject: RE: [Birding-Aus] White Ibis studies in Sydney Region
> To: David Berg <>
> Cc: 
> Message-ID: <>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> It should be noted Ibis are considered a pest species on the gold coast
> and nests are actively
> removed and the egss destroyed ine the breeding season for a number of
> years.
>
>
> Quoting David Berg <>:
>
> > I agree, one of the sickest items of cruelty to animals I've read in
> > a while. And its carried out by government bodies that should be
> > looking after native species. Ibises for ever!
> >
> >   Dave Berg
> >
> > storm <> wrote:
> >   Alan, Greg
> >
> > It's reports like this that make the general public think it's ok to
> > rubbish
> > Ibis. This is about a 'humane' way to kill off the eggs of an
> > 'aggressive'
> > species. I can't think of anything more aggressive than a species
> > that will
> > kill off another's young.
> >
> > http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/10/11/2056320.htm
> >
> > The Australian ibis, with its white body plumage, black head and neck
> > and
> > long curved bill, is a common bird in north and east Australia and
> > more
> > often than not, it is near a rubbish bin near you.
> >
> > The reason for that is that its usual feeding and breeding areas in
> > the
> > western wetlands have dried out.
> >
> > But researchers have found a way they say that is 100 per cent
> > effective in
> > controlling the nuisance species and it involves common cooking oil,
> > but not
> > a cooking pot, thankfully.
> >
> > The same method can be applied to other bird pests like starlings,
> > pigeons
> > and Indian mynas.
> >
> > Sydney's Centennial Park is a swathe of green in the heart of the
> > city but
> > at the moment it is also a hot bed of hormones.
> >
> > On a small island in the middle of one of the park's lakes, several
> > hundred
> > ibis are busy attracting a mate.
> >
> > They are honking and lifting their wings to reveal a red streak, a
> > sign that
> > the bird is ready to breed.
> >
> > Professor Joan Dawes is from Pestat, a group that develops ways to
> > control
> > pest species.
> >
> > She first came across egg oiling in the United States during a visit
> > to the
> > Department of Agriculture.
> >
> > The Americans had just finished trials using everyday cooking oil to
> > coat
> > the eggs of Canada geese and seagulls.
> >
> > The idea is that the baby bird is starved of oxygen inside the egg
> > and the
> > egg never hatches.
> >
> > "They're quite big and quite aggressive birds. They'll eat anything
> > at all
> > and they'll also just walk up to little kids and take a sandwich or
> > an
> > ice-cream out of their hands and probably peck them in the process,"
> > she
> > said.
> >
> > "So it was a particularly easy, cheap, simple process and I thought
> > that it
> > might be worth trying here in Australia."
> >
> > John Martin is one of the park rangers in Sydney's Centennial Park
> > and he
> > has had a 100 per cent success rate on his first trial of egg
> > oiling.
> >
> > Birds nesting on one island in the park had their eggs sprayed with
> > the oil
> > and none of them hatched.
> >
> > The birds also did not return to that island for the next breeding
> > season.
> >
> > "The common technique used is nest and egg destruction and when you
> > do that
> > the birds - what we've observed is that ibis commonly just re-nest,"
> > he
> > said.
> >
> > "So it's a lot of effort for them to build another nest and then lay
> > another
> > clutch of eggs, so with the oiling technique it actually stops them
> > from
> > laying another clutch of eggs.
> >
> > "They continue to incubate the eggs which they've already laid, but
> > they're
> > not going to hatch."
> >
> > Professor Dawes says the only thing that can be concluded is that as
> > a
> > social, nesting species they communicate with each other.
> >
> > "Word got out that this was not a good place to nest and that they
> > weren't
> > going to rear young if they did nest there," she said.
> >
> > But it seems that warning message was only passed on among ibis, not
> > other
> > bird species.
> >
> > On the trial island, cormorants are now breeding in fig trees and a
> > camphor
> > laurel tree 20 metres above where the ibis had their eggs oiled.
> >
> > The researchers also say egg oiling may be a cheap and effective way
> > for
> > city councils to eradicate problem birds like the ibis and
> > potentially
> > starlings and pigeons.
> >
> > "One of the advantages of this is that it's a food oil and so there
> > are
> > absolutely no health or safety or environmental consequences to its
> > use,"
> > Professor Dawes said.
> >
> > "You could just go to the supermarket and buy the canola oil and use
> > that."
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: 
> >  Behalf Of Gregory
> > Little
> > Sent: Thursday, 10 January 2008 4:38 PM
> > To: 'alan morris'; 
> > Subject: RE: [Birding-Aus] White Ibis studies in Sydney Region
> >
> >
> > Gooday Alan and all
> >
> > Just as an aside re Ibis, I was recently out on a daily walk along
> > the
> > back of Maryland on the edge of Hexham Swamp (near Newcastle, NSW)
> > and
> > as I passed a fellow walker I commented on how good it was to see
> > the
> > White Ibis nesting in a patch of nearby Paperbarks. He answered very
> > shortly "that they are a pest and steal food and bother people". I
> > assumed he meant those Ibis in Sydney at the Zoo and Hyde Park etc.
> >
> > Greg Little
> >
> > Greg Little - Principal Consultant
> > General Flora and Fauna
> > PO Box 526
> > Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia
> > Ph 02 49 556609
> > Fx 02 49 556671
> > www.gff.com.au
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: 
> >  On Behalf Of alan morris
> > Sent: Thursday, 10 January 2008 4:17 PM
> > To: 
> > Subject: [Birding-Aus] White Ibis studies in Sydney Region
> >
> > Hi Birders,
> > Can anyone tell me who to contact in respect to the colour-banding
> > project
> > of breeding White Ibis in the Sydney region?
> >
> > A contact of mine has been recording band numbers and colours, and
> > wants to
> > know to whom he should pass on the details?
> >
> > Alan Morris
> >
> > ===============================
> > www.birding-aus.org
> > birding-aus.blogspot.com
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> > send the message:
> > unsubscribe
> > (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> > to: 
> > ===============================
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.0/1216 - Release Date:
> > 9/01/2008 10:16 AM
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.0/1216 - Release Date:
> > 9/01/2008 10:16 AM
> >
> >
> > ===============================
> > www.birding-aus.org
> > birding-aus.blogspot.com
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> > send the message:
> > unsubscribe
> > (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> > to: 
> > ===============================
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.0/1216 - Release Date:
> > 09/01/2008
> > 10:16 AM
> >
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.0/1216 - Release Date:
> > 09/01/2008
> > 10:16 AM
> >
> > ===============================
> > www.birding-aus.org
> > birding-aus.blogspot.com
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> > send the message:
> > unsubscribe
> > (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> > to: 
> > ===============================
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Make the switch to the world's best email. Get the new Yahoo!7 Mail
> > now.
> > ===============================
> > www.birding-aus.org
> > birding-aus.blogspot.com
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> > send the message:
> > unsubscribe
> > (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> > to: 
> > ===============================
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:01:26 +1000
> From: peter crow <>
> Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] White Ibis studies in Sydney Region
> To: 
> Cc: 
> Message-ID: <>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
> Ibis are a pest because people fed them.
>
> People are the cause of the problem. Usually stupid people.
>
> The solution of destroying eggs is not a solution at all. It is not
> treating the cause but simply attempting to lessen the result of the
> problem.
>
> The problem is People feeding the birds.
>
> If there is no food for the Ibis to scavange from people the ibis
> will be no problem.
>
> Some, in fact much of the feeding is intentional. Watch the picnicers
> throwing food to the birds.
>
> So is unintentional but equally stupid where people leave food at
> overflowing bins or even on the ground beside bins.
>
> The killing of native species without a permit is illegal.
>
> Destroying eggs and nests is also illegal.
>
> on the Gold Coast the council were for years the cause and main
> feeder of ibis.
>
> They or their contractors spread refuse including lots of food waste
> over large areas of dumps daily and left large areas uncovered where
> thoousands of birds could feed.
>
> I understand this has been changed to some degree.
>
> Its time members of this list stood up for all native brds and spoke
> out strongly against those interested in "controlling species by any
> form of culling.
>
> Peter
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:18:15 +1100
> From: 
> Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] White Ibis studies in Sydney Region
> To: peter crow <>
> Cc: 
> Message-ID: <>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> People are the cause of the problem I agree, and some measures have been
> undertaken in the
> Gold Coast City refuse tips to limit the amount of food avaibale and to
> trial techniques to
> discourage the ibis from landing at the tips to feed. But the program of
> nest and egg removal has
> ind is still very successful in contolling and reduncing the number of
> ibis on the Gold Coast. The
> Ibis were roosting in such large numbers that they are/were destroying the
> vegetation associated
> with their roosts. No hatched chicks or adults are directly harmed in the
> program, and in
> combination with measures undertaken at refuse tips it could be considered
> to very successful in
> reducing numbers of Ibis. Food is so readily avaibale that they are
> breeding twice in one season on
> te Gold Coast Region, and this program was conisdered an alterative to
> actually undertaking a cull
> as is approved by the EPA etc.
>
> It should be noted i have not been invloved in this program for anumber of
> years and only
> rpoviding information from when i was involved for 2 years undertaking
> ibis surveys ats refuse tips
> on behalf of the GCCC for the consultancy running the program.
>
> Regards, Simon Muirhead
>
> Quoting peter crow <>:
>
> > Ibis are a pest because people fed them.
> >
> > People are the cause of the problem. Usually stupid people.
> >
> > The solution of destroying eggs is not a solution at all. It is not
> >
> > treating the cause but simply attempting to lessen the result of the
> >
> > problem.
> >
> > The problem is People feeding the birds.
> >
> > If there is no food for the Ibis to scavange from people the ibis
> > will be no problem.
> >
> > Some, in fact much of the feeding is intentional. Watch the picnicers
> >
> > throwing food to the birds.
> >
> > So is unintentional but equally stupid where people leave food at
> > overflowing bins or even on the ground beside bins.
> >
> > The killing of native species without a permit is illegal.
> >
> > Destroying eggs and nests is also illegal.
> >
> > on the Gold Coast the council were for years the cause and main
> > feeder of ibis.
> >
> > They or their contractors spread refuse including lots of food waste
> >
> > over large areas of dumps daily and left large areas uncovered where
> >
> > thoousands of birds could feed.
> >
> > I understand this has been changed to some degree.
> >
> > Its time members of this list stood up for all native brds and spoke
> >
> > out strongly against those interested in "controlling species by any
> >
> > form of culling.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:10:21 +0930
> From: Denise Goodfellow <>
> Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Rarities Committees (long)
> To: Keith Weekes <>,      Nikolas Haass
>        <>
> Cc: Birding Aus <>
> Message-ID: <>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="ISO-8859-1"
>
> I followed the discussion on BARC while in Brisbane recently, and wish to
> add my perspective.
>
> I am a birding/natural history guide of some 25 year¹s experience.  Most
> of
> my clients are Americans, many very experienced birders. For some decades
> I
> also worked as a biological consultant carrying out avifaunal (and other)
> surveys across the Top End and in the NW of WA.  I led teams researching
> Gouldian Finch and their habitat across central and southern Top End.
>
> I¹m also the author or co-author of a number of bird books (more about
> this
> in a later email), and I lecture on birds for the University of NSW study
> abroad program.
>
> Yet a few years ago, my sightings of birds I know well but were out of
> normal range, were rejected by the local Atlassing committee.  One, a
> Silver-backed Butcherbird, I spotted at Daly Waters in the Wet Season.   I
> must admit, I was rather taken aback.
>
> On a recent trip down the Tablelands Highway, I saw flocks of Little
> Curlew,
> and Fork-tailed Swift, and noted Pictorella Mannikins and a Golden-backed
> Honeyeater.  But given this past experience, and others I won¹t go into
> here, there is little incentive for me to submit any sort of official
> record.  After all, if an authority believes I can¹t recognise a common
> bird
> such as Silver-backed Butcherbird, why should I waste my time?
>
> I would prefer to stick with my birding clients, who seem happy with my
> efforts, help my semi-traditional Aboriginal relatives preserve their
> occupancy of outstations in Arnhem Land, and try to do something about the
> spread of Gamba grass, a transformer species, that has the potential to
> wipe
> out more avifauna than you could shake a stick at.
>
>
> Denise Lawungkurr Goodfellow
> 1/7 Songlark Street
> BAKEWELL NT 0832
> Ph. 61 08 89 328306
> > www.denisegoodfellow.com
> http://web.mac.com/goodfellowdl
> > http://www.earthfoot.org
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/baby-dreaming
>   http://www.ausbird.com
>
> Entrant in Women Entrepreneurs:
> 18 Inspiring Stories of Small Business Success.
> A publication by the Australian Government¹s Office
> for Women and Small Business.
>
>
>
>
>
> on 18/12/07 6:55 AM, Keith Weekes at  wrote:
>
> > Nikolas
> >
> > I don't think anyone is suggesting the committee members are "evil".
> They
> > are all widely respected birders and/or twitchers and as I understand it
> > mostly with appropriate scientific qualifications. I also understand the
> > rationale of being very cautious in accepting records.
> >
> > But, whether or not it's true, there is clearly a perception that BARC
> is a
> > bit of a club and that you shouldn't bother submitting interesting
> sightings
> > unless you have irrefutable evidence of them (not just your own
> sighting,
> > but photos, measurements, videos, DNA samples and so on) or you're a
> member
> > of the club. That's quite understandable of course. I think people also
> need
> > to inject a sense of reality into things and realise that it's
> appropriate
> > for BARC members to treat a report from someone they know for a fact to
> be
> > excellent at identifying birds in the field as more authoritative than a
> > report from an unknown.
> >
> > However, reading the reports there does seem to be a bit of a skew
> towards
> > trying as hard as possible to rule sightings out. It seems that there is
> an
> > attitude of "we're 99% sure but can't rule out x" so we're not allowing
> it.
> > (eg http://users.bigpond.net.au/palliser/barc/SUMM459.htm)
> >
> > I have no idea, but maybe a few more "false positives" in areas of
> > uncertainty and where it's not a "first sighting" would be of more
> > scientific value than the current system which seems to:
> >
> > (a) tend towards excluding records (possibly incorrectly); and
> > (b) discourage people from reporting.
> >
> > Also, there is an impression that even detailed field notes and
> observations
> > often don't seem to cut it. I know that if I ever come across a possible
> > American Golden Plover I'm just going to shoot the thing and submit the
> > corpse.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 17/12/2007, Nikolas Haass <> wrote:
> >>
> >> What is wrong with Australia's birders' attitude toward Rarities
> >> Committees?
> >>
> >>
> >> To my earlier post, I got several private responses which seemed to be
> >> driven rather by anger than anything else:
> >>
> >> "As for the committee members, many do it for their own ego, and
> nothing
> >> else."
> >>
> >> "To be told I need to look at feather length when plumage colour varies
> is
> >> ridiculous."
> >>
> >> "How can a group of people who weren't there say you didn't see a
> >> particular bird?"
> >>
> >> "It seems to me that if you don't have a camera or aren't part of the
> 'in'
> >> crowd, i.e. know someone on the committee then your record will almost
> >> certainly fail."
> >>
> >> "This is not a good system. It only serves to encourage the who gives a
> >> shit about the committee attitude."
> >>
> >> "This is also not helped by such comments as xxx's on the topic (of the
> >> magpie) who basically said don't bother putting in a submission form
> for the
> >> magpie as he will reject it."
> >>
> >> "Yes we need a system of checking claims, but we need one that either
> >> works or that people have confidence in (preferably both). At the
> moment we
> >> do not have such a system."
> >>
> >> "While the committee always treats submissions with respect that has
> not
> >> been the level of conduct of some members."
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Here some of my comments in response:
> >>
> >>> How can a group of people who weren't there say you didn't see a
> >> particular bird? It seems to me that if you don't have a camera or
> aren't
> >> part of the
> >>> 'in' crowd, i.e. know someone on the committee then your record will
> >> almost certainly fail.
> >>> This is not a good system. It only serves to encourage the who gives a
> >> shit about the committee attitude. This is also not helped by such
> comments
> >> as
> >>> xxx's on the topic (of the magpie) who basically said don't bother
> >> putting in a submission form for the magpie as he will reject it.
> >>> Yes we need a system of checking claims, but we need one that either
> >> works or that people have confidence in (preferably both). At the
> moment we
> >> do
> >>> not have such a system.
> >>
> >> Again I can only speak for the many committees I have experience with
> and
> >> the three committees I worked for. You said "How can a group of people
> who
> >> weren't there say you didn't see a particular bird?". I agree it is
> >> difficult, but of course they can - it all depends on the quality of
> your
> >> report. Ideally you submit photographs, but usually you don't
> necessarily
> >> need to. If you report all the key field marks you observed, maybe draw
> a
> >> sketch pointing out important observed features and explain how and why
> you
> >> ruled out other similar species, your record should NOT fail! To my
> >> experience (which is an international experience), only a small
> minority of
> >> records are rejected - the idea is NOT to reject records, the idea is
> to
> >> make observations scientifically valid. Typically only very bad
> descriptions
> >> which don't rule out other more likely species or reports proving that
> the
> >> seen species is not the reported species (e.g. an accompanying
> photograph
> >> clearly
> >> shows another 'common' species) get rejected immediately (if all
> members
> >> agree). All 'tricky' ones will be discussed by all members of the
> committee
> >> and in many cases more experts will be asked for advice. Of course the
> >> committee members are humans and it can happen that a member looks at a
> >> perfect picture of a 'common species' which has been sent in as a 'rare
> >> species' and says "Bullshit". But this rare event shouldn't discourage
> good
> >> birders to contribute to science.
> >> It is also not true that the committees ignore escapees and releases -
> >> again I am speaking for other Rare Birds Committees, because I have no
> >> experience with BARC. These birds just end up in another category - one
> for
> >> released and escaped birds (e.g. if you saw a Flightless Cormorant
> [from
> >> Galapagos] in Australia it would end up in such a category). If
> populations
> >> of released or escaped birds are self-sustaining for a certain period
> >> (typically 10 years or so) these species will enter another category -
> one
> >> for self-sustaining populations of escaped or released birds (e.g.
> >> Eurasian Blackbird, ...).
> >> I do agree that the system is not ideal. But it is the best system we
> were
> >> able to come up with. BTW all members of the committees are volunteers.
> They
> >> spend their personal time and money (for travelling) to do this job. I
> >> really don't think those people are evil.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> So you are telling me to take a camera or don't bother submitting a
> >> report?
> >>
> >> I was telling you exactly the opposite: I said that typically if you
> >> report all the key field marks you observed you DON'T necessarily need
> a
> >> camera! (see e-mail above)
> >>
> >>> As for the committee members, many do it for their own ego, and
> nothing
> >> else.
> >>
> >> That's absolutely wrong for all the committees I know. All of us do
> this
> >> job without any advantage - however, we are putting quite some time
> into
> >> this volunteer work. I don't see any advantage for any kind of 'ego'.
> >> Especially since no committee member is allowed to review his/her own
> record
> >> (of course!).
> >>
> >>> To be told I need to look at feather length when plumage colour varies
> >> is ridiculous.
> >>
> >> That is not ridiculous. Many field guides are misleading regarding
> plumage
> >> colour. In many cases the RELATIVE length of certain feathers is an
> >> important key (e.g. tail projection, wing projection, primary
> projection
> >> etc.)
> >> And again: everybody can have his own personal list at home and no one
> >> would bother. However, I believe that it is a pity that many not
> reported
> >> sightings are lost for science. Therefore I still think it is the best
> to
> >> report to the appropriate committee.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> My original post:
> >>
> >> I "give a shit what Rare Birds Committees think"! I can't speak for
> BARC.
> >> However, in my "American life" I was a member of the New Jersey Rare
> Birds
> >> Committee (NJBRC, the New Jersey counterpart of BARC) and in my "German
> >> life" I was a member of the Hessen Rare Birds Committee (AKH) and the
> >> Schleswig-Holstein Rare Birds Committee (AKSH) (two German counterparts
> of
> >> BARC). The idea of Rare Birds Committees is NOT to 'kill' a tick on
> >> someone's 'list'. No, the most important job of Rare Birds Committees
> is to
> >> peer review the documentation of a 'rare bird' (reports and photos,
> >> sketches, sound recordings - or whatever you submit), to collect,
> publish,
> >> and archive the records that prove that a 'rare bird' occurred.
> Therefore,
> >> documentation must eliminate any other species that might be confused
> with
> >> the claimed rarity. Some documentation is clear cut, such as a good
> >> photograph which shows identification characters. Some documentation is
> less
> >> clear cut, and that's why there is a large committee with a variety of
> >> specialties, opinions,
> >> and skills to vote on the evidence. To learn about recent range
> expansions
> >> of certain species it is also important to get an idea if a bird came
> on its
> >> own or was released by someone.
> >> Serious scientific journals only use data that were accepted by the
> >> responsible Rare Birds Committee for their analysis. That's why I'd
> like to
> >> encourage observers of a 'rarity' to document it, so that it can be
> used for
> >> scientific studies.
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Nikolas
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------
> >> Nikolas Haass
> >> 
> >> Sydney, NSW
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> _____________________________________________________________________________
> >> _______
> >> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> >> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
> >> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> >>
> >> www.birding-aus.org
> >> birding-aus.blogspot.com
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> >> send the message:
> >> unsubscribe
> >> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> >> to: 
> >>
> > ===============================
> > www.birding-aus.org
> > birding-aus.blogspot.com
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> > send the message:
> > unsubscribe
> > (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> > to: 
> > ===============================
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 19:29:51 +1000
> From: "Natalia Atkins" <>
> Subject: [Birding-Aus] Re: Lapwings
> To: 
> Message-ID:
>        <>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> I was interested to hear the news about the lapwings in our area
> (Bulimba),
> so thankyou!! I just read something disturbing though - Minnippi Parklands
> will be converted into a Golf course /housing area, as of mid last year.
> It
> has been protested, due to it being the habitat of several endangered
> species.  The developer said he'd put `no pet signs' around.the place,
> lol.
>
> That makes me so sad. I spend as much time as I can in the little patches
> of
> Urban forests around Brisbane. There is a whole world out of life in them,
> fiercing struggling to survive. Its a big loss.
>
> I'll eb sure to check out those lapwings though, and thanks so much for
> the
> news!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 11
> > Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 07:10:45 +1000
> > From: peter crow <>
> > Subject: [Birding-Aus] Lapwings
> > To: BIRDING-AUS <>
> > Message-ID: <>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
> >
> >
> > Minnippi Parklands is an area beside Bulimba Creek in Brisbane's
> > eastern Suburbs. It contains a small split lake which has been almost
> > completely dry for some time.
> > Masked Lapwings have taken over a dry area of mud in the southern
> > pond and it has not been uncommon to see a dozen or more there.
> > Over the last week we have had over 100mm of rain and the water level
> > has risen resulting in less bare mud but not enough water for most
> > water birds although a couple of Black Ducks were present.
> > The interesting thing is that yesterday there were at least 41 Masked
> > Lapwing on the remaining dry mud or in the shallow water.
> > I have seen large flocks of Banded Lapwing in the outback but never
> > such a large group of masked.
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:29:33 +1100
> From: "Philip Jackson" <>
> Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] RFI Bulbuls in Melb
> To: "John Harris" <>,
>        <>,    "birdingBirding Aus"
>        <>
> Message-ID: <>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
>        reply-type=original
>
> I walk my dogs in Wilson's Reserve at least once a week and I haven't seen
> or heard a Bulbul for the last 12 months either; in fact it has been at
> least 18 months. Without wishing to reignite the debate over introduced
> species, my few sightings of R-w Bulbuls at Wilson's Reserve gave me
> considerable pleasure and I will be sorry if they have died out. And no
> finger-wagging over dog ownership either!
> Philip Jackson
>
>
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: White Ibis studies in Sydney Region (David Berg), Natalia Atkins <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU