birding-aus
|
To: | "'russ lamb'" <> |
---|---|
Subject: | Blue-faced Beethoven and sacrificial pigeons |
From: | "Stephen Ambrose" <> |
Date: | Thu, 6 Dec 2007 08:22:56 +1100 |
Russ, I'm not a lawyer, but if you have a permit to clear habitat (e.g. for property development or crop production), then under the law this action is probable deemed "reasonable", "necessary" and "justifiable". Therefore, you would not be culpable under the NSW Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1979. Perhaps there are some lawyers who subscribe to Birding-aus who could confirm this to be the case or otherwise. Stephen Ambrose Ryde, NSW -----Original Message----- From: On Behalf Of russ lamb Sent: Wednesday, 5 December 2007 9:19 PM To: Stephen Ambrose Cc: 'Birding Aus' Subject: Blue-faced Beethoven and sacrificial pigeons Stephen, I'm interested to know what form(s) of evidentiary tests would be applied to determine whether a bird had been terrified or infuriated ? Could not the same tests be applied to any form of deliberate habitat destruction (eg for house building) or disturbance at a wader roost? Russ Lamb, Maleny, SEQ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Blue-faced Beethoven and sacrificial pigeons, russ lamb |
---|---|
Next by Date: | An unexpected bird, Russell Woodford |
Previous by Thread: | Blue-faced Beethoven and sacrificial pigeons, russ lamb |
Next by Thread: | Blue-faced Beethoven and sacrificial pigeons, Peter Shute |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU