birding-aus
|
To: | "Mike Carter" <>, "BIRDING-AUS" <>, "John Penhallurick" <> |
---|---|
Subject: | Royal Albatross, C & B taxonomy and Biogeography. |
From: | "Ross Silcock" <> |
Date: | Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:45:06 -0500 |
Mike et al:Sorry I wasn't more clear; my comment referred to "given populations" not specifically the Royal Alby pair. I replied off-line to John as follows (in part): <<<Actually, I don't think the evidence suggests the Royals are separate species. Here's what I say in my Pacific Checklist (www.rosssilcock.com): "It has been proposed (Robertson and Nunn in Robertson and Gales 1998) thatthe 2 subspecies be accorded specific status, although mixed pairs occur SI [South Island] and Auckland Is (see below; Robertson and Gales 1998), and cytochrome b studies show very little distance between the taxa (Penhallurick and Wink 2004). Although plumage sequences differ significantly, the taxa are retained as subspecies herein, as suggested by Penhallurick and Wink (2004).">>> Ross Ross Silcock P.O. Box 57 Tabor, IA 51653 New Zealand Land and Pelagic Bird Tours http://www.rosssilcock.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | A problem with Blackbirds, Bill Stent |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Terns, Chris Sanderson |
Previous by Thread: | Royal Albatross, C & B taxonomy and Biogeography., Mike Carter |
Next by Thread: | Royal Albatross, Andrew Taylor |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU