The article suggested that the "advisory committee" is pro-hunting - sort of
like a peak body for shooters, integrated into the DSE. It's also listed on
this site in a manner to suggest it's pro-hunting:
http://www.dse.vic.gov.au/dse/nrenrt.nsf/childdocs/-29F8B43D223B4D9E4A2568C7002392A3-C18AE1CA3FB90F3DCA2570A6001C78D1?open
"Hunting organisations provide important input to the management of game
hunting in Victoria and are widely consulted during policy development.
They also provide a number of services to members, including educational
activities, skills improvement, shooting facilities and social events."
On 16/05/07, Bill Stent <> wrote:
Shooting more "humanely" = using a bow and "nerf" arrows. Either that or
hurling insults, like "your mother is a goose!" Try calling a pacific black
duck a teal and see the reaction. If I were a duck, I'd find misdiagnois
very insulting ... but probably not as insulting as anti-aircraft fire.
Um, are you sure that the "Victorian Hunting Advisory Committee" is a
pro-hunting advocacy group?
Bill
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
===============================
|
