birding-aus
|
To: | <> |
---|---|
Subject: | Eden Pelagic Trip Report |
From: | "Peter Shute (NUW)" <> |
Date: | Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:10:47 +1100 |
On Monday, November 13, 2006 2:23 PM Simon Mustoe wrote: Short-tailed Shearwater 110698 / 1302 I assume you didn't count 110,698 birds one by one, and that this is the sum of several rough estimates of some huge groups and some individually counted small groups? Is this the way it's normally done in birding? In other fields you'd be expected to round the final number in order to avoid implying a precision greater than it actually is, e.g 111,000. What techniques are used to try to improve the accuracy of the large group counts? Peter Shute =============================== www.birding-aus.org birding-aus.blogspot.comTo unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line) to: =============================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Eden Pelagic Trip Report, Simon Mustoe |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Photos of a mega-twitch in Britain, steveclark |
Previous by Thread: | Eden Pelagic Trip Report, Simon Mustoe |
Next by Thread: | Alice/Uluru trip report, Frank Rheindt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU