Re wind farms

To:	Birding-aus <>
Subject:	Re wind farms
From:	"Evan Beaver" <>
Date:	Mon, 15 May 2006 18:42:18 +1000

Why do people keep bringing this up? We all just state our positions, ignore
everyone else, then repeat a few weeks later.

I want to talk about birds.

See the following email.

Evan

On 5/15/06, polymath <> wrote:


Michael,

I'll try & get the figures on greenhouse gas emission savings (being the
lists resident meteorologist).

However, I think I'll side with David Suzuki and not you and saying that
windfarms are far less unsighlty than smokestacks or the results global
warming.  Got some better ideas?

Mick...

--------------------------------------------------
Mick Pope - Natural Philosopher. "Zum Erstaunen bin ich da"
http://natural-philosopher.blogspot.com
Review Editor - Zadok Perspectives http://www.zadok.org.au
Editor - ISCAST Bulletin http://www.iscast.org.au/bulletin

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re wind farms, Terry Bishop Re wind farms, michael hunter Re wind farms, Dave Torr Re wind farms, michael hunter Re wind farms, Dave Torr Re wind farms, polymath Re wind farms, Evan Beaver <= Re wind farms, Carl Clifford Re wind farms, Bill Stent Re wind farms, John Leonard Re wind farms, Tony Russell Re wind farms, Carl Clifford

Previous by Date:	Re wind farms, polymath
Next by Date:	Philipines Eagle Status?, Evan Beaver
Previous by Thread:	Re wind farms, polymath
Next by Thread:	Re wind farms, Carl Clifford
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU