birding-aus

Noisy miners and egrets and the like (part 3)

To: "'Birding Aus'" <>
Subject: Noisy miners and egrets and the like (part 3)
From: "Colin Driscoll" <>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 20:46:42 +1100
All
 
Interesting replies. I have observed the Noisy Miners over many years here at the lake edge and sure they are a cranky bunch. However they have different reactions to different events. General harassment is in their nature and I often see pardalotes, honeyeaters, figbirds running the Noisy Miner gauntlet. The local Black-faced Cuckoo-shrikes actually fly about 100m off shore when commuting between patches of bushland just to avoid them. They are very useful indicators of matters of potential interest and just a couple of days ago they were going 'off' at what turned out to be a Striated Heron up in a Swamp Oak. There is a resident Green Tree Snake around my yard and they always let me know where it is in the trees with an entirely different alarm call.
 
So to the egrets in particular. The Noisy Miner reaction to these birds flying along the lake edge (which happens almost daily) is quite shrill and different again to some of their other alarm calls. Their alarm at the Egret surprises me as I presume it isn't a predator species for the Noisy Miners. They don't even flick a glance at any of the cormorants or darter that fly along the same route as the egret.
 
What got me thinking about the profile thing was seeing Noisy Miners going off at an egret flying high over the Toronto urban area the other day. With a big rookery nearby there are always cormorants and ibis flying over but it seems the egret is singled out for special alarm.
 
Cheers
 
Colin
 
 


From: Ricki Coughlan [
Sent: Tuesday, 14 March 2006 6:00 PM
To: Chris Sanderson; Philip Veerman
Cc: Colin Driscoll; Birding-aus (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [BIRDING-AUS] Noisy miners and egrets and the like (part 2)

G'day all
 
I was actually present at the kite flying "experiment" which Chris refers to. It was a simple rectangular shape and it sent thousands of waders up immediately. A shorebird disturbance monitoring study has been in effect for almost 12 months on the northern side of Roebuck Bay and this should present some interesting data in this regard when they're eventually published.
 
Light aircraft and larger, up to Boeing 737s, fly across Roebuck Bay not infrequently throughout the day and my observations are that these seldom cause the tiniest stint to raise its supercilium. However, helicopters always appear to send the roosting waders into a panic (with much fist shaking from birders and conservationists below!).
 
I too have observed Ospreys taking fish next to roosting wader flocks without sending them up and yet at other times sending flocks up immediately.  Everyone who has observed large flocks of roosting birds will report that sometimes they go up as a result of false alarms. It only takes one nervous bird that thinks that a threat might be present and that's enough. For those who have ever had to "twinkle" flocks of waders, the subtle dynamics between a flock which feels secure, or a little wary, or ready to panic presents and "edge" which can be hard to "work" or define sometimes.
 
Habituation and laziness is an important element which would present a slightly confounding factor for anyone attempting to research these matters. Many birds have this well worked out for themselves. I once witnessed an adult White-bellied Sea-Eagle repeatedly pass over a pretty large mixed flock (15,000) of godwits, knots, tattlers, terns, etc.. On the first occasion the flock went up, moved a long way off shore with the whole convoluted "mexican wave" effect (like a school of fish) in full wonderful evidence, before returning to their roost. On the second fly-by, they didn't go so far. On the third, a little less. On the fourth fly-by, the waders went up only a short way with none of the "mexican wave" effect. On this occasion, our sea-eagle just stalled in the middle of our lazy flock, popped out his talons, grasped a nice plump Red-Knot and flew off with what would have been a rapidly spiflicated victim for his afternoon snack. 
 
This was a very graphic illustration that our sea-eagle's theory of habituation was a very good way for him to acquire a feed. It also proves that even among the birds, it is often brains and resourcefulness which separates the "haves" from the "have-knots".
 
And, by the way, Noisy Miners will prepare a mobbing offence against just about any creature that invades their turf - whether it's forward or in reverse, frequent or rare.
 
Happy Birding
Ricki
Belrose, Sydney
 
 
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU