birding-aus

Permethryn again

To: <>
Subject: Permethryn again
From: "Graham Turner" <>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:54:03 +1000
 
Try
 
for a very dry and technical evaluation which concludes
 
"Permethrin is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans (Group 3)."
 
 
Which means....
 
"
  • Group 3: The agent (mixture or exposure circumstance) is not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans.

This category is used most commonly for agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans and inadequate or limited in experimental animals.

Exceptionally, agents (mixtures) for which the evidence of carcinogenicity is inadequate in humans but sufficient in experimental animals may be placed in this category when there is strong evidence that the mechanism of carcinogenicity in experimental animals does not operate in humans.

Agents, mixtures and exposure circumstances that do not fall into any other group are also placed in this category. "

from: http://www.inchem.org/documents/iarc/monoeval/eval.html

 

As for 'safe concentrations' remember,

"All substances are poisons; there is none which is not a poison.

The right dose differentiates a poison?." Paracelsus (1493-1541)"

 

Most domestic products seem to be at around 2.5 - 5/0 g/kg (roughly the same as ml/L).

www.apvma.gov.au/ may have some more information.

In the end it comes down to the trade off between malaria, dengue etc and possible health effects of permethryn.

 

Cheers

Graham Turner

 
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU