birding-aus

Re: Eastern Whipbird Antiphonal Song

To:
Subject: Re: Eastern Whipbird Antiphonal Song
From: "Dean Portelli" <>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 15:02:10 +1000
Syd asked about sexual size dimorphism in Eastern Whipbirds.

As it wasn't my project I do not know the basis for which the PhD student I was working with used to sex the birds on measurements, although it was clear there was consistently one sex larger than the other. I do not know whether DNA samples were taken.

Having looked over HANZAB, they measured museum specimens of each sex and found a significant difference in wing length, tail length, bill length(? - BILL S in HANZAB), and tarsus between adult male and female and first immature male and female. This was for the nominate subspecies occurring in SE Australia. For subspecies lateralis of Nth QLD, only adult skins were measured and the differences between the sexes was found in wing and tail lengths only. In all cases where a significant difference occurred the mean for the male was larger than the mean for the female (i.e. male was the larger sex). Weight of males was also larger but this was not statistically significant. All museum specimens would have been sexed on reproductive organs.

So while a significant difference doesn't preclude overlap in measurements between the sexes (it indicates that the difference in the means of the two or more groups being tested are greater than what could be expected by chance), when you have a pair that are inferred to be a pair from behavioural observations then the larger bird can be reliably sexed as the male (and the colour-banding allowed the pairs to be clearly identified through consistent association such as foraging together, calling to each other with vocalisations other than song, and also through duetting - this study was a great use of colour-banding by the way, it just yielded so much data).

Laurie replied to me personally and described an experience with Eastern Whipbirds responding to his imitation of the introductory whistle (that precedes the actual whip 'crack'). When we were working in the field we also observed that the birds may sometimes reply to imitations of the whislte (none of us could do the crack very well!). I think it was also observed that neighbouring birds may reply to an introductory whistle, and males sometimes gave this without the whip crack.

Cheers, Dean

_________________________________________________________________
ninemsn Extra Storage is now available. Get larger attachments - send/receive up to 2MB attachments (up to 100 percent more per e-mail). Go to http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/home&pgmarket=en-au

Birding-Aus is on the Web at
www.shc.melb.catholic.edu.au/home/birding/index.html
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message
"unsubscribe birding-aus" (no quotes, no Subject line)
to 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU