"Tim Dolby" <>
Tue, 06 Mar 2001 18:24:20 +1100
> Michael hunter wrote "Is twitching a science?"
Depending on definitions, I would argue no, "twitching" is a mental and
physical game, a past time - need I say a "sport".
"Birdwatching" (which incorporates "twitching") is a past time which can lead
to a greater understanding of the natural history of birds, and consequently
provide assistance in the development of the science of ornithology - as well
as the wider scientific paradigm of ecology, a branch of biology.
For instance the debate over whether we include ship assisted birds on our
"list" is a example of this dichotomy. On the one hand twitching asks whether
you include because you can add it to your list of 'Australian" birds; on the
other in we consider it from the science of ecology we examine the implication
that such a sighting could have on the environment, etc.
Birdwatching I would argue fits somewhere in between - a concern for the
environment from a 'scientific' or natural history viewpoint, but also the joy
of the birds in terms of the aesthetic appreciation (or whatever emotional word
you fancy, ie "love" of birds).
Birding-Aus is on the Web at
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message
"unsubscribe birding-aus" (no quotes, no Subject line)
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering
takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely
a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way.
If you wish to get material removed from the archive or
have other queries about the archive e-mail
Andrew Taylor at this address: