birding-aus
|
To: | "Andy Burton's Bush Tours" <>, Birding-Aus Mail <> |
---|---|
Subject: | Qld. land clearing controls |
From: | (Richard Johnson) |
Date: | Fri, 25 Aug 2000 13:16:25 +1000 |
Andy, you're spot on as far as the mulga lands of Qld go. I have been prevaricating
about replying to Peter et al. and you've saved me the trouble.
However, I think I will say something now!
The degradation of land there is a fairly complex story with it's roots essentially in over-expectation of the capacity of a drought-prone area with low-nutrient, fragile soils and native pasture with limited resilience. (Over)grazing combined with removal of fire as a control on woody plants has freed several Eremophila spp and mulga to become dominant plants in what was generally a more open grassy woodland ecosystem. Invasion by these species ultimately produces a mid-dense shrub layer that effectively suppresses grass and leads to a bare soil surface even more prone to erosion. A hard subsoil crust is then left, reducing rainwater infiltration and so increasing runoff, and hence erosion so that a downward spiral in land degradation sets in. So much for the lessons of hindsight. Today's graziers in this area are now in the situation where low returns per hectare mean that land remediation is simply not economically feasible. Sheep are the mainstay of the grazing industry ( the mulga is generally fairly ordinary cattle country as far as carrying capacity and fattening potential go) but note the poor state of the wool industry at the moment. I have heard academics voice the opinion that even as a national issue, repair of much of the mulglands is just not on - there are too many other competing priorities. So what are the graziers to do? Much land covered by 'turkey bushes' (E. gilesii, E. bowmanii) is pretty much gone, though E. gilesii is at times killed in large areas by grasshoppers. Dense mulga, on the other hand, can be 'pulled' or 'pushed' to allow regeneration of grassy understorey and this is what I think Julie McLaren is referring to. Remember, the only other option to this is to either push the remaining good country even harder - a short-term going-nowhere solution - or to get out. Who'd be a woolgrower in the mulga? There are some bright spots on the horizon though. The wool price is picking up a bit and China might be buying big soon. A Landcare group in the Charleville has come up with a relatively cheap way of regenerating grass under turkey bush which might prove generally useful. And perhaps most important of all, most graziers are well aware of the limitations of their land and try to manage it accordingly. Before bagging the cocky, put yourselves in his/her shoes. how many of us can confidently say we always do the rational, sensible thing when it comes to resource use? And how many of us would be prepared to go under economically doing the 'right thing'? Richard Andy Burton's Bush Tours wrote: I suspect that clearing to stop erosion just might make sense under --
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | tree clearing, Joyce Harding |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Northern pintail, Michael J Hunter |
Previous by Thread: | Qld. land clearing controls, Andy Burton's Bush Tours |
Next by Thread: | Qld. land clearing controls, norris |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU