birding-aus
|
To: | Birding-Aus Mail <> |
---|---|
Subject: | Short-billed Dowitcher subspecies |
From: | Tony Palliser <> |
Date: | Thu, 24 Feb 2000 09:52:02 +1100 |
Andrew, Congratulations on your recent success chasing the elusive Short-billed Dowitcher. To answer your question about why it has been suggested that this bird may be hendersoni rather than caurinus will depend upon (hopefully) the quality of notes taken from a number of observers. There are some excellent papers available some of which may help to
clench this one. Rather than repeat everything may I refer you
Pittway. R. 1992: Birding Vol XXIV: Number 5: 309-310
One thing is for certain - peoples notes and interpretations of what
they saw will vary for a number of reasons. Your notes differ
Other factors that might turn out useful will be the colour and patterning
of the feathers on the mantle, scapulars and tertials and
Apparently caurinus is very variable so it may take some work
yet. The photograph on p310 fig 2 of Birding October 1992 looks very
Hope this helps Regards
One question: the bird is generally thought to be of
*********************************
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Wood Sandpiper, Alan Stuart |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Albatross status., Tony Russell |
Previous by Thread: | Wood Sandpiper, Alan Stuart |
Next by Thread: | Cookilaria papers, David James |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU