birding-aus Bird lists seen vs heard

birding-aus

birding-aus Bird lists seen vs heard

To:	"Birding-Aus" <>
Subject:	birding-aus Bird lists seen vs heard
From:	"Philip A Veerman" <>
Date:	Wed, 27 Oct 1999 16:02:54 +1000

People are questioning about whether we should include heard records on
lists. Is there anyone out there who, when doing bird surveys and camping
out at night, hears something obvious like a Boobook, a Bush Stone-curlew or
an Owlet-Nightjar does not include it on the list? There are plenty of other
examples like that.

To unsubscribe from this list, please send a message to

Include ONLY "unsubscribe birding-aus" in the message body (without the
quotes)

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
birding-aus Bird lists seen vs heard, Philip A Veerman <= Re: birding-aus Bird lists seen vs heard, Laurence and Leanne Knight

Previous by Date:	Re: birding-aus Banding recovery, Peter Menkhorst
Next by Date:	birding-aus (Fwd) african impressions.Natal3, wvader
Previous by Thread:	birding-aus Banding recovery, jack . krohn
Next by Thread:	Re: birding-aus Bird lists seen vs heard, Laurence and Leanne Knight
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU