birding-aus

Re: birding-aus birding ethics

To:
Subject: Re: birding-aus birding ethics
From: Brian Fleming <>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 17:14:47 +1000
 wrote:
> 
> If you are out birding and find a dead bird that is still identifiable
> do you think it should be added to your checklist?
>                                             thank you,
>                                                     Jason

Beach-washed and other dead specimens get added to the list for
Australia if they haven't been seen before, so why shouldn't they go
onto your list with the relevant note. Such things certainly go into
Anthea's notebooks. But we are not dedicated LISTERs.

If golf is a good walk spoiled, might not LISTING be good birdwatching
spoiled? Tick it and watch it as well. On the other hand listers have
the chance of seeing the differences so may pick up rarities just
because they HAVE seen them before. Both Watchers and Listers are
needed. 

Brian Fleming
To unsubscribe from this list, please send a message to

Include ONLY "unsubscribe birding-aus" in the message body (without the
quotes)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU