birding-aus

on a recent paper on phylogeny

To:
Subject: on a recent paper on phylogeny
From: David James <>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 11:36:26 +1000
>Date:         Tue, 13 Oct 1998 23:00:56 +0900
>Reply-To: Fer-Jan de Vries <>
>Sender: NBHC ID-FRONTIERS Frontiers of Field Identification
>              <>
>From: Fer-Jan de Vries <>
>Subject:      [BIRDWG01] on a recent paper on phylogeny
>To: 
>
>I would like to draw attention to a recent paper on phylogeny:
>
>        Two spinal cords in birds:
>        novel insights in early avian evolution.
>        C.Jeffery Woodbury.
>        Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B(1998) 265, 1697-1705
>
>
>In this interesting paper the "dorsal horn of the spinal grey matter"
>is analysed in a great variety of bird species.
>
>The conclusion is that "the traditional orders (Wetmore 1960)
>Gruiformes, Columbiformes, Cuculiformes, and Piciformes are
>unnatural", and that "the most successful group of birds, songbirds of
>the order Passeriformes, arose far earlier than is generally believed,
>well before the origine of most non-passerines."
>
>The message of the paper, as far as I understand it, is that the
>division of birds in "primitive" Palaeognaths and "modern" Neognaths
>is characterized by the structure of the dorsal horn, which can be
>split (schizocerate) in case of the Neognaths or non-split
>(leiocerate) in case of the Palaeognaths and more generally the
>Amniotes, the most recent common ancestors of extant mammals and
>reptiles, and all their descendants. In order words, the splitted
>dorsal horn seems to be a recent character of only a modern group of
>birds.
>
>The author checked the dorsal horn systematically. He found that the
>"old birds" ratites and tinamous, as well as the cranes and allies,
>doves, cuckoos, woodpecker-like birds and songbirds have non-split
>dorsal horns, and that all the other birds have split dorsal horns.
>
>Interestingly four taxa are polymorphic: Gruiformes, Columbiformes,
>Cuculiformes and Piciformes, suggesting that these taxa are not
>"secure", and apparently these taxa have been debated in the past.
>
>Gruiformes: most Gruiformes are non-split,
>        but bustards and sunbittern  are split.
>
>Columbiformes: pigeons and doves are all non-split,
>        but sandgrouse are split
>
>Cuculiformes: cuckoos are non-split,
>        but tauracos and the hoatzin are split.
>
>Piciformes: suborder of Pici (woodpeckers, toucans, and barbets) are
>        all non-split
>        suborder Galbulae is polymorphic: puffbirds are non-split
>                                          jacamars are split.
>
>
>Have a look at it!
>
>Fer-Jan de Vries,
>Tsukuba, Japan.
>
>
David James
PO BOX 5225
Townsville Mail Centre 4810

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU