birding-aus
|
To: | |
---|---|
Subject: | re: replies.... |
From: | (Scott Chandry) |
Date: | Thu, 18 Sep 1997 11:25:39 +0000 |
I completely agree with Rob concerning the scarcity of public responses to RFIs. My guess is that if you are interested you can right to the person who sent the RFI and they will most likely send you the fruits of their request. A short time ago I sent an RFI concerning Pajinka and several people wrote me wanting copies of the responses I received (which I sent). One question though. How do those who kindly answer RFIs feel about having their messages sent to others? Would they prefer not to have private emails forwarded? Maybe they would prefer that their responses were sent on without their details (address, name, etc) attached? Are private responses meant to be private or are people simply using the answer button which diverts to the sender and not the list? Is it your public duty to file a trip report if you use RFI derived information? Any comments Scott P. Scott Chandry or |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: Ultra-sonic call of WT Nightjar, Conole, Lawrie |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Ultra-sonic call of WT Nightjar, Ian Temby |
Previous by Thread: | Re: replies...., Anne & Roger Green |
Next by Thread: | To Huntervalley NSW Subscribers re: Eaglereach Area, Vella, Edwin |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU