--- Jayne Dickinson <> wrote:
> Have you tried Lantronix UDS 200 ?
Yeah, the Lantronix device would probably be better, but overall I
would not choose Lantronix any more.
I use Lantronix's XPORT-03 on a product and the overwhelming
difficulty I have with the device is that it is not only not open
source, the Borland C functions that are public and thus callable
aren't usually documented. One can side step the difficulties by
being clever, but there's just a lot of functionality that's not
possible.
Thing is, I made a mistake specifying XPORT-03 on the product I
developed because while the device does what most people need, there
are so many things that the device can't do because it's not open and
Lantronix will not release the device's source code.
At the same time, Rabbit and other like-minded devices _are_ open
source and one can dig at the internals and tailor behavior to meet
specific needs, something that takes a bit of an effort with non-open
Lantronix devices.
If the original poster is just playing around and wants to develop
something using his or her existing hardware, I have some software
that does s-to-e and e-to-s again.
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|