>
>
> Any thoughts or hints gratefully received, I'm rather stumped at the
> moment!
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
Further to this I've found that adio suffers the same fate. Arguably
corroborating evidence to my cached memory idea is that as soon as I put
the system under heavy load (e.g. in another session do ls -lR / | gzip
> /dev/null') the button becomes far more responsive. My guess at this
is the other processes running cause the cache to become dirty that much
quicker. Of course, this could all still be a figment of my
imagination. My next port of call is to write a quick kernel module and
see what happens if I use that instead.
Thanks,
Matt
-==-
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2pRQfA/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/CFFolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ts-7000/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|