I am implementing the camera access and still haven't got the code completed
enough to see the images retrieved by the camera, so I cannot perform a
complete test to your patch. If there is anyone else that can test it, please
do so.
In the mean time, if I am able to test your patch, I will send you the
results.
Hugo Costelha
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 16:19, Luc Saillard wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:11:07PM +0000, Ivor Hewitt wrote:
> > Luc Saillard wrote:
> > >On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:49:27AM +0000, Hugo Filipe Costelha De Castro
> > >wrote:
> >
> > I guess the question is what do other drivers use for auto-shutter? 0
> > seems like a sensible choice, after all why else would you be setting a
> > zero exposure.
>
> Here the patch, can you test it before commit ?
>
> # svn diff pwc-v4l.c
> Index: pwc-v4l.c
> ===================================================================
> --- pwc-v4l.c (revision 89)
> +++ pwc-v4l.c (working copy)
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
> .id = V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE,
> .type = V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_INTEGER,
> .name = "Shutter Speed (Exposure)",
> - .minimum = 1,
> + .minimum = 0,
> .maximum = 256,
> .step = 1,
> .default_value = 200,
> @@ -699,7 +699,7 @@
> return 0;
> case V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE:
> c->value <<= 8;
> - ret = pwc_set_shutter_speed(pdev,
> 0, c->value); + ret =
> pwc_set_shutter_speed(pdev, c->value?0:1, c->value); if (ret<0)
> return -EINVAL;
> return 0;
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pwc mailing list
>
> http://lists.saillard.org/mailman/listinfo/pwc
_______________________________________________
pwc mailing list
http://lists.saillard.org/mailman/listinfo/pwc
|