Andrew,
Absolutely, applying an EQ to parabolic recordings would be preferred and w=
ould improve any scientific analysis of the sounds, although almost no one =
does it. The EQ would have to change slightly based on calculations involvi=
ng subject distance, temperature, humidity conditions, and the parabolic ga=
in curve. For perfect scientific analysis, subjects would probably need to =
be recorded in a studio, but that is pretty much impractical.
Bruce Rutkoski
Owner
www.wildtronics.com
---In <> wrote :
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for the reply, very useful. if you apply EQ, are the frequencies s=
till measurable for statistical purposes?
Andrew Perkin
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|