vqs3bweu2lnw2ewjtv
Date: Wed Mar 22, 2017 4:05 pm ((PDT))
Gregory,
So the bottom line is low noise, which comes at a price,literally.
Thanks
On 22 Mar 2017 16:01, "Gregory O'Drobinak
[naturerecordists]" <> wrote:
>
>
> A quick check of the specs indicates that the self-noise is rather high a=
t
> 19 dBA so it's probably not a good choice for quiet nature areas.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* "micro Phonic [naturerecordists]" <
> >
> *To:*
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:16 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Nature Recordists] Stereo mic
>
>
> Thanks Arthur. The AudioTechnica 2022 XY looks decent, at $259.
> Martin
>
> On 22 Mar 2017 07:17, "Arn=FE=F3r Helgason
> [naturerecordists]" <> wrote:
>
>
> I think you hardly gett any mics for around 200 Dollars which would
> satisfy your needs.
> The Rode NT4 is usable but it is a little sensitive for wind as most of
> the Stereo mics.
> Audiotechnica has several microphones which have been used for that kind
> of sound.
>
> Best regards, Arnthor Helgason
> http://hljod.blog.is
>
>
> =DEann 22.3.2017 02:04, skrifa=F0i micro Phonic
> [naturerecordists]:
>
>
> Would appreciate any advice on getting a stereo mic for Roland R05. For
> soundscape work, mainly water river, shorelines. Something in the $200
> bracket.
> Martin
>
>
>
>
>
>
|