Subject: | Re: EIN from Sound Devices 788 |
---|---|
From: | "Juan Pablo Culasso Alonso" jpculasso |
Date: | Mon Aug 24, 2015 8:34 am ((PDT)) |
I spoke with greg Budney and William Mccay regarding that. The cornell lab = test measured that the 788t is quieter than the 702. I do not remember the = numbers now. Best, Juan. > On Aug 24, 2015, at 12:09, emil klotzsch [naturerecordists]= <> wrote: > > hi, > > Sound devices have not stated the Eqivalent Input Noise on the Specs site= from the 788. > I asked them, and today they answered me =84looks like -126db=93. (althou= gh they did not say how they measuered, with how much ohm and filter yes or= no) > i have to say, that surprised me. > the 702 has -130db EIN. That would mean the 788 is not as good regarding = the self noise, as compared to the 702-744 recorders.. > can that really be? > anyone did a comparison here? > > best > emil > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | EIN from Sound Devices 788, emil klotzsch |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: EIN from Sound Devices 788, Dan Dugan |
Previous by Thread: | EIN from Sound Devices 788, emil klotzsch |
Next by Thread: | Re: EIN from Sound Devices 788, Dan Dugan |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU