naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

[Nature Recordists] Digest Number 6398

To: "" <>
Subject: [Nature Recordists] Digest Number 6398
From: "" <>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 08:16:47 +0000
There are 11 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1a. Re: Editing Apps    
    From:  amandine.gasc

2a. Question about background levels    
    From: J. Charles Holt
2b. Re: Question about background levels    
    From: Bernie Krause
2c. Re: Question about background levels    
    From: Bernie Krause
2d. Re: Question about background levels    
    From: J. Charles Holt
2e. Re: Question about background levels    
    From: Bernie Krause
2f. Re: Question about background levels    
    From: Peter Shute
2g. Re: Question about background levels    
    From: J. Charles Holt
2h. Re: Question about background levels    
    From:  madl74

3a. Re: Shure KSM141    
    From:  madl74

4. An interview with Chris Watson    
    From: J. Charles Holt


Messages
________________________________________________________________________
1a. Re: Editing Apps
    Posted by:   amandine.gasc
    Date: Wed Jun 10, 2015 4:42 am ((PDT))

What about the app 'Spectrum view'. I am not sure about all the editing options 
but you can record and see the spectrogram instantaneously. Plus ti seems that 
they added a lot of options in the free version of it. It is pretty cool. 



 Amandine 





Messages in this topic (4)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
2a. Question about background levels
    Posted by: "J. Charles Holt"  
    Date: Wed Jun 10, 2015 1:29 pm ((PDT))

I noticed something while listening to the CD that accompanies Bernie Kraus's 
book Wild Soundscapes that I'm curious about. 

On track 6 with the hydrophone, there's some background hiss or noise. The 
level on it drops noticeably whenever there's a vocalization from whatever 
underwater creature is being recorded. Also, on track 11, there's some wind in 
the background later in the track. Again, its level dips whenever other sounds 
take precedence. Is this an acoustical trick my mind is playing on me, or is it 
something technical related to the recording?

As always, I appreciate everyone's knowledge and help—it's invaluable to us 
"newbies." :)

- Charles

(Pardon my terseness or typos, this was sent from my iPhone.) 




Messages in this topic (8)
________________________________________________________________________
2b. Re: Question about background levels
    Posted by: "Bernie Krause"  bigchirp1
    Date: Wed Jun 10, 2015 1:38 pm ((PDT))

It�s been over a dozen years since the original version of the book was 
published and the CD conformed, Charles, and I don�t remember the particulars 
of the examples. But I�ll give it a listen and see if I can identify the 
problem. In any event a new version of the book, completely updated, is being 
published by Yale University Press, and will be out and available in the 
spring. So I�m glad you called those issues to my attention, now. If there is a 
problem, I�ll correct it. By the way, hang onto that copy. They�re selling the 
original versions in mint condition on eBay and elsewhere for nearly $200USD.

Bernie


On Jun 10, 2015, at 1:29 PM, 'J. Charles Holt'  
[naturerecordists] <> wrote:

> I noticed something while listening to the CD that accompanies Bernie Kraus's 
> book Wild Soundscapes that I'm curious about. 
> 
> On track 6 with the hydrophone, there's some background hiss or noise. The 
> level on it drops noticeably whenever there's a vocalization from whatever 
> underwater creature is being recorded. Also, on track 11, there's some wind 
> in the background later in the track. Again, its level dips whenever other 
> sounds take precedence. Is this an acoustical trick my mind is playing on me, 
> or is it something technical related to the recording?
> 
> As always, I appreciate everyone's knowledge and help�it's invaluable to us 
> "newbies." :)
> 
> - Charles
> 
> (Pardon my terseness or typos, this was sent from my iPhone.) 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> Posted by: "J. Charles Holt" <>
> ------------------------------------
> 
> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a 
> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 

Wild Sanctuary
POB 536
Glen Ellen, CA 95442
707-996-6677
http://www.wildsanctuary.com

SKYPE: biophony
FaceBook: http://www.facebook.com/BernieKrauseAuthor
TED Global talk: 
http://www.ted.com/talks/bernie_krause_the_voice_of_the_natural_world.html













Messages in this topic (8)
________________________________________________________________________
2c. Re: Question about background levels
    Posted by: "Bernie Krause"  bigchirp1
    Date: Wed Jun 10, 2015 2:14 pm ((PDT))

Charles, I�ve just listened to both tracks you mentioned, both w/ and w/o 
headphones, and with two different types of speakers (Meyer HD-1s and B&Ws 
studio monitors) and do not hear anything like the issue you�re addressing. 
What you�re describing usually occurs when a recordist uses �compression� or 
�limiting� while recording or, after, during the mix. I have never used either 
signal-processing component in any of my recordings or in post-production and 
when I look at the signal(s) graphically as a spectrogram, if there was a level 
drop of noise related to signal, it would show up, there. It definitely doesn�t 
in any of the programme material I�ve heard or looked at so far.

If you could point out any specific time in the tracks where these phenomena 
occur, I�ll give it another, more careful shot. But, overall, the product looks 
good as promised.

Bernie Krause

  

 


On Jun 10, 2015, at 1:29 PM, 'J. Charles Holt'  
[naturerecordists] <> wrote:

> I noticed something while listening to the CD that accompanies Bernie Kraus's 
> book Wild Soundscapes that I'm curious about. 
> 
> On track 6 with the hydrophone, there's some background hiss or noise. The 
> level on it drops noticeably whenever there's a vocalization from whatever 
> underwater creature is being recorded. Also, on track 11, there's some wind 
> in the background later in the track. Again, its level dips whenever other 
> sounds take precedence. Is this an acoustical trick my mind is playing on me, 
> or is it something technical related to the recording?
> 
> As always, I appreciate everyone's knowledge and help�it's invaluable to us 
> "newbies." :)
> 
> - Charles
> 
> (Pardon my terseness or typos, this was sent from my iPhone.) 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> Posted by: "J. Charles Holt" <>
> ------------------------------------
> 
> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a 
> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 

Wild Sanctuary
POB 536
Glen Ellen, CA 95442
707-996-6677
http://www.wildsanctuary.com

SKYPE: biophony
FaceBook: http://www.facebook.com/BernieKrauseAuthor
TED Global talk: 
http://www.ted.com/talks/bernie_krause_the_voice_of_the_natural_world.html













Messages in this topic (8)
________________________________________________________________________
2d. Re: Question about background levels
    Posted by: "J. Charles Holt"  
    Date: Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:07 pm ((PDT))

Bernie,

Thank you very much for taking the time to respond. First of all, please 
understand that I wasn�t accusing you of any shenanigans�but you did, in fact, 
answer my question, even though you didn�t realize it. The problem was entirely 
on my end. I had imported your CD into my iTunes library so that I could listen 
to it on my iPhone through headphones without having to sit at my computer 
(which contains the only CD player in the house). I imported it using Apple 
Lossless for good quality, but what I din�t think about was that iTunes Match 
was taking the tracks, compressing them, and then making them available on my 
phone. Sure enough, when I sat back at the computer and gave a listen, I found 
that the tracks sounded perfect, without any of the ducking I was hearing. As I 
mentioned, I�m new to this. Lesson learned, and I hope I didn�t raise your 
heart rate too much. 

I�m very excited about the new edition of the book! Thanks for all of your 
contribution, and I was excited to have the author himself respond so quickly! 
I was embarrassed, however, to find my faux pas.

� Charles

> On Jun 10, 2015, at 3:14 PM, Bernie Krause  
> [naturerecordists] <> wrote:
> 
> Charles, I�ve just listened to both tracks you mentioned, both w/ and w/o 
> headphones, and with two different types of speakers (Meyer HD-1s and B&Ws 
> studio monitors) and do not hear anything like the issue you�re addressing. 
> What you�re describing usually occurs when a recordist uses �compression� or 
> �limiting� while recording or, after, during the mix. I have never used 
> either signal-processing component in any of my recordings or in 
> post-production and when I look at the signal(s) graphically as a 
> spectrogram, if there was a level drop of noise related to signal, it would 
> show up, there. It definitely doesn�t in any of the programme material I�ve 
> heard or looked at so far.
> 
> 
> If you could point out any specific time in the tracks where these phenomena 
> occur, I�ll give it another, more careful shot. But, overall, the product 
> looks good as promised.
> 
> Bernie Krause
> 
>   
> 
>  
> 
> 
> On Jun 10, 2015, at 1:29 PM, 'J. Charles Holt'  
> <> [naturerecordists] 
> < <>> 
> wrote:
> 
>> I noticed something while listening to the CD that accompanies Bernie 
>> Kraus's book Wild Soundscapes that I'm curious about. 
>> 
>> On track 6 with the hydrophone, there's some background hiss or noise. The 
>> level on it drops noticeably whenever there's a vocalization from whatever 
>> underwater creature is being recorded. Also, on track 11, there's some wind 
>> in the background later in the track. Again, its level dips whenever other 
>> sounds take precedence. Is this an acoustical trick my mind is playing on 
>> me, or is it something technical related to the recording?
>> 
>> As always, I appreciate everyone's knowledge and help�it's invaluable to us 
>> "newbies." :)
>> 
>> - Charles
>> 
>> (Pardon my terseness or typos, this was sent from my iPhone.) 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------
>> Posted by: "J. Charles Holt" < 
>> <>>
>> ------------------------------------
>> 
>> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a 
>> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------
>> 
>> Yahoo Groups Links
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> Wild Sanctuary
> POB 536
> Glen Ellen, CA 95442
> 707-996-6677
> http://www.wildsanctuary.com <http://www.wildsanctuary.com/>
>  <>
> SKYPE: biophony
> FaceBook: http://www.facebook.com/BernieKrauseAuthor 
> <http://www.facebook.com/BernieKrauseAuthor>
> TED Global talk: 
> http://www.ted.com/talks/bernie_krause_the_voice_of_the_natural_world.html 
> <http://www.ted.com/talks/bernie_krause_the_voice_of_the_natural_world.html>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 





Messages in this topic (8)
________________________________________________________________________
2e. Re: Question about background levels
    Posted by: "Bernie Krause"  bigchirp1
    Date: Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:13 pm ((PDT))

No problem, Charles. I�m glad you found the source of the problem. Happy to be 
of help.

Bernie

On Jun 10, 2015, at 3:07 PM, 'J. Charles Holt'  
[naturerecordists] <> wrote:

> 
> 
> Bernie,
> 
> Thank you very much for taking the time to respond. First of all, please 
> understand that I wasn�t accusing you of any shenanigans�but you did, in 
> fact, answer my question, even though you didn�t realize it. The problem was 
> entirely on my end. I had imported your CD into my iTunes library so that I 
> could listen to it on my iPhone through headphones without having to sit at 
> my computer (which contains the only CD player in the house). I imported it 
> using Apple Lossless for good quality, but what I din�t think about was that 
> iTunes Match was taking the tracks, compressing them, and then making them 
> available on my phone. Sure enough, when I sat back at the computer and gave 
> a listen, I found that the tracks sounded perfect, without any of the ducking 
> I was hearing. As I mentioned, I�m new to this. Lesson learned, and I hope I 
> didn�t raise your heart rate too much. 
> 
> I�m very excited about the new edition of the book! Thanks for all of your 
> contribution, and I was excited to have the author himself respond so 
> quickly! I was embarrassed, however, to find my faux pas.
> 
> � Charles
> 
>> On Jun 10, 2015, at 3:14 PM, Bernie Krause  
>> [naturerecordists] <> wrote:
>> 
>> Charles, I�ve just listened to both tracks you mentioned, both w/ and w/o 
>> headphones, and with two different types of speakers (Meyer HD-1s and B&Ws 
>> studio monitors) and do not hear anything like the issue you�re addressing. 
>> What you�re describing usually occurs when a recordist uses �compression� or 
>> �limiting� while recording or, after, during the mix. I have never used 
>> either signal-processing component in any of my recordings or in 
>> post-production and when I look at the signal(s) graphically as a 
>> spectrogram, if there was a level drop of noise related to signal, it would 
>> show up, there. It definitely doesn�t in any of the programme material I�ve 
>> heard or looked at so far.
>> 
>> 
>> If you could point out any specific time in the tracks where these phenomena 
>> occur, I�ll give it another, more careful shot. But, overall, the product 
>> looks good as promised.
>> 
>> Bernie Krause
>> 
>>   
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> On Jun 10, 2015, at 1:29 PM, 'J. Charles Holt'  
>> [naturerecordists] <> wrote:
>> 
>>> I noticed something while listening to the CD that accompanies Bernie 
>>> Kraus's book Wild Soundscapes that I'm curious about. 
>>> 
>>> On track 6 with the hydrophone, there's some background hiss or noise. The 
>>> level on it drops noticeably whenever there's a vocalization from whatever 
>>> underwater creature is being recorded. Also, on track 11, there's some wind 
>>> in the background later in the track. Again, its level dips whenever other 
>>> sounds take precedence. Is this an acoustical trick my mind is playing on 
>>> me, or is it something technical related to the recording?
>>> 
>>> As always, I appreciate everyone's knowledge and help�it's invaluable to us 
>>> "newbies." :)
>>> 
>>> - Charles
>>> 
>>> (Pardon my terseness or typos, this was sent from my iPhone.) 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------
>>> Posted by: "J. Charles Holt" <>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a 
>>> sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Yahoo Groups Links
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> Wild Sanctuary
>> POB 536
>> Glen Ellen, CA 95442
>> 707-996-6677
>> http://www.wildsanctuary.com
>> 
>> SKYPE: biophony
>> FaceBook: http://www.facebook.com/BernieKrauseAuthor
>> TED Global talk: 
>> http://www.ted.com/talks/bernie_krause_the_voice_of_the_natural_world.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Wild Sanctuary
POB 536
Glen Ellen, CA 95442
707-996-6677
http://www.wildsanctuary.com

SKYPE: biophony
FaceBook: http://www.facebook.com/BernieKrauseAuthor
TED Global talk: 
http://www.ted.com/talks/bernie_krause_the_voice_of_the_natural_world.html













Messages in this topic (8)
________________________________________________________________________
2f. Re: Question about background levels
    Posted by: "Peter Shute"  pshute2
    Date: Wed Jun 10, 2015 3:46 pm ((PDT))

Charles, can you explain some more about iTunes Match and what it does? I 
assume Apple Lossless format didn't compress the dynamic range, so it would be 
interesting to know exactly how they got changed later.

Peter Shute 

> -----Original Message-----
> From:  
>  
> Sent: Thursday, 11 June 2015 8:08 AM
> To: 
> Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Question about background levels
> 
>   
> 
> Bernie,
> 
> Thank you very much for taking the time to respond. First of 
> all, please understand that I wasn't accusing you of any 
> shenanigans-but you did, in fact, answer my question, even 
> though you didn't realize it. The problem was entirely on my 
> end. I had imported your CD into my iTunes library so that I 
> could listen to it on my iPhone through headphones without 
> having to sit at my computer (which contains the only CD 
> player in the house). I imported it using Apple Lossless for 
> good quality, but what I din't think about was that iTunes 
> Match was taking the tracks, compressing them, and then 
> making them available on my phone. Sure enough, when I sat 
> back at the computer and gave a listen, I found that the 
> tracks sounded perfect, without any of the ducking I was 
> hearing. As I mentioned, I'm new to this. Lesson learned, and 
> I hope I didn't raise your heart rate too much. 
> 
> I'm very excited about the new edition of the book! Thanks 
> for all of your contribution, and I was excited to have the 
> author himself respond so quickly! I was embarrassed, 
> however, to find my faux pas.





Messages in this topic (8)
________________________________________________________________________
2g. Re: Question about background levels
    Posted by: "J. Charles Holt"  
    Date: Wed Jun 10, 2015 4:14 pm ((PDT))

Peter,

iTunes Match is a paid service that Apple offers. What it does is scan all of 
the music in your iTunes library (up to 25,000 items). If it matches to a title 
they have available in their store, they make that track available for download 
on all of your devices that use the same Apple ID. If you have a track that 
isn’t available on iTunes (such as the Wild Soundscapes CD) it uploads it to 
their servers in 256-Kbps AAC format. More information is available here: 
https://www.apple.com/itunes/itunes-match/ 
<https://www.apple.com/itunes/itunes-match/>

The advantage of it is that if you have a large library that you want access to 
but don’t want to have to store the entire thing on your device, you can access 
everything at the touch of a button as long as you have an internet connection. 
The downside, if you’re an audiophile, is that the tracks are compressed using 
lossy compression—although in those instances, you can still manually sync the 
original  items to your library.

Let me know if you have any questions about this or anything else Apple 
related. I’m a member of the Apple Consultants Network, and this is what I do. 
Everyone here is welcome to contact me outside of the group at any time. 
There’s a contact page at our website at PEBMAC.com <http://pebmac.com/>. I 
don’t want to clutter up the group with irrelevant stuff, but I’m also happy to 
be able to give back to the members however I can. :D

– Charles

> On Jun 10, 2015, at 4:46 PM, Peter Shute  [naturerecordists] 
> <> wrote:
> 
> Charles, can you explain some more about iTunes Match and what it does? I 
> assume Apple Lossless format didn't compress the dynamic range, so it would 
> be interesting to know exactly how they got changed later.
> 
> Peter Shute 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:  
> > <> 
> >  
> > <>] 
> > Sent: Thursday, 11 June 2015 8:08 AM
> > To:  
> > <>
> > Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] Question about background levels
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Bernie,
> > 
> > Thank you very much for taking the time to respond. First of 
> > all, please understand that I wasn't accusing you of any 
> > shenanigans-but you did, in fact, answer my question, even 
> > though you didn't realize it. The problem was entirely on my 
> > end. I had imported your CD into my iTunes library so that I 
> > could listen to it on my iPhone through headphones without 
> > having to sit at my computer (which contains the only CD 
> > player in the house). I imported it using Apple Lossless for 
> > good quality, but what I din't think about was that iTunes 
> > Match was taking the tracks, compressing them, and then 
> > making them available on my phone. Sure enough, when I sat 
> > back at the computer and gave a listen, I found that the 
> > tracks sounded perfect, without any of the ducking I was 
> > hearing. As I mentioned, I'm new to this. Lesson learned, and 
> > I hope I didn't raise your heart rate too much. 
> > 
> > I'm very excited about the new edition of the book! Thanks 
> > for all of your contribution, and I was excited to have the 
> > author himself respond so quickly! I was embarrassed, 
> > however, to find my faux pas.
> 
> 





Messages in this topic (8)
________________________________________________________________________
2h. Re: Question about background levels
    Posted by:   madl74
    Date: Wed Jun 10, 2015 5:03 pm ((PDT))

Ah, the curse of the hidden compressor/limiter strikes again. All DAC's have 
one and some are better than others. The trick is to record well below peak 
level and bring it up afterwards in a sound editor. 

At work, when digital came in, the BBC dropped the line-up level from -8 to 
 -14 to keep clear of overloads which tape could cope with better but with 
inevitable tape hiss. I never missed that tape hiss. :-) 

David Brinicombe





Messages in this topic (8)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
3a. Re: Shure KSM141
    Posted by:   madl74
    Date: Wed Jun 10, 2015 4:46 pm ((PDT))

> I have seen no comments about it and it worries me a little that the 
> self-noice is said to be 14 db.

Arnthor, 

Short answer: 14 dB noise from a reliable manufacturer sounds like a real 
spec. 

I have basic rules of thumb when it comes to specs apart from taking them 
with a pinch of salt. 

1) If a lot of people buy a fairly expensive mic, it can't be too bad. 

2) The more you pay, the truer the specs. 

3) Specs are for selling gear, not for using it. All mics add noise, but it 
doesn't necessarily sound the same for the same spec. 

4) The best specs you will find for noise are about 12dB and when you get to 
18dB they sound hissy. 

5) Wildlife is not hi-fi, and other specs are more important like handling 
noise, robustness, working while wet and not packing up. The KSM141 is sold 
as a studio mic and may not be as robust as some others sold as ENG or video 
camera mics. 

I buy good used mics and get better mics for the same money. 

David Brinicombe 







Messages in this topic (2)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
4. An interview with Chris Watson
    Posted by: "J. Charles Holt"  
    Date: Wed Jun 10, 2015 7:43 pm ((PDT))

I came across this short interview with Chris Watson, famed location sound 
specialist for the BBC.

http://www.kitplus.com/articles/Location_Sound_Recording_And_Post-production_with_Chris_Watson/196.html

A few notes on his gear, which is heavily focused on in the article: 
* He records at 48 kHz, 24 bit. 
* He prefers Sennheiser MKH mics and also uses the DPA 4060s. 
* Sound Devices recorder (what else?)
* Nuendo 4 for post

- Charles

(Pardon my terseness or typos, this was sent from my iPhone.) 




Messages in this topic (1)



"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a 
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/

<*> Your email settings:
    Digest Email  | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
     
    

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
    https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Nature Recordists] Digest Number 6398, naturerecordists@yahoogroups.com <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU