[Top] [All Lists]

Re: progress in automated birdsong recognition?

Subject: Re: progress in automated birdsong recognition?
From: jasonpudd
Date: Thu Jul 24, 2014 3:32 pm ((PDT))
Hi Bernie,

 Yes, The precautionary approach that the EU is taking is very prudent.  When 
somebody is trying to make a buck they forget that science is suppose to be 
used to live with nature and not conquer it.  Supporting the good independent 
research that is being done is critical.  There has been so much written about 
these chemicals recently.  I think the CBC article covered all the points well.


"While a picture is worth a thousand words, a 
sound is worth a thousand pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.

Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> Your email settings:
    Digest Email  | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU