[Top] [All Lists]

Re: progress in automated birdsong recognition?

Subject: Re: progress in automated birdsong recognition?
From: "Bernie Krause" bigchirp1
Date: Thu Jul 17, 2014 10:42 am ((PDT))
That=92s way cool, Dan. Thanks for bringing this to our attention.


On Jul 17, 2014, at 6:33 PM, Dan Dugan  [naturerecordists] =
<> wrote:

> Forwarded to me (Dan Dugan):
> Scientists from Queen Mary University of London have found a successful w=
ay of identifying bird sounds from large audio collections, which could be =
useful for expert and amateur bird-watchers alike.
> The analysis used recordings of individual birds and of dawn choruses to =
identify characteristics of bird sounds. It took advantage of large dataset=
s of sound recordings provided by the British Library Sound Archive, and on=
line sources such as the Dutch archive called Xeno Canto.
> Publishing in the journal PeerJ, the authors describe an approach that co=
mbines feature-learning -- an automatic analysis technique -- and a classif=
ication algorithm, to create a system that can distinguish between which bi=
rds are present in a large dataset.
> "Automatic classification of bird sounds is useful when trying to underst=
and how many and what type of birds you might have in one location," commen=
ted lead author Dr Dan Stowell from QMUL's School of Electronic Engineering=
 and Computer Science and Centre for Digital Music.
> Dr Stowell was recently awarded a five-year fellowship from the Engineeri=
ng and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) to develop computerised p=
rocesses to detect multiple bird sounds in large sets of audio recordings.
> "Birdsong has a lot in common with human language, even though it evolved=
 separately. For example, many songbirds go through similar stages of vocal=
 learning as we do, as they grow up, which makes them interesting to study.=
 From them we can understand more about how human language evolved and soci=
al organisation in animal groups," said Dr Stowell.
> He added: "The attraction of fully automatic analysis is that we can crea=
te a really large evidence base to address these big questions."
> The classification system created by the authors performed well in a publ=
ic contest using a set of thousands of recordings with over 500 bird specie=
s from Brazil. The system was regarded as the best-performing audio only cl=
assifier, and placed second overall out of entries from 10 research groups =
in the competition.
> The researchers hope to drill down into more detail for their next projec=
> Dr Stowell says, "I'm working on techniques that can transcribe all the b=
ird sounds in an audio scene: not just who is talking, but when, in respons=
e to whom, and what relationships are reflected in the sound, for example w=
ho is dominating the conversation."
> Story Source:
> The above story is based on materials provided by Queen Mary, University =
of London. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.
> Journal Reference:
> Stowell D, Plumbley MD. Automatic large-scale classification of bird soun=
ds is strongly improved by unsupervised feature learning. PeerJ, 2014 DOI:1=
Message: 0.
Subject: 7717/peerj.488

Wild Sanctuary
POB 536
Glen Ellen, CA 95442

SKYPE: biophony
TED Global talk (12Jun13):

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU