il.com
Date: Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:31 am ((PDT))
Thanks Tim,
I traded my Strat guitar in on the R26 and happy the choice. Now into the =
woods for some recording.
Cheers
Chad
On Jul 22, 2014, at 6:04 AM, 'Tim Bartlett' [nat=
urerecordists] <> wrote:
>
> Hi again Chad,
>
>
>
> Yeah the R26 size is appealing =96 perhaps you should consider whether yo=
u think you will use the extra channels on the 680 or not. The 680 used to =
be double the price of the R26 but can now be picked up cheaper so it is a =
bit of a dilemma.
>
>
>
> As far as your other question goes, I cannot give you any guarantees on t=
hat but would have assumed that would work ok yes=85we have recorded with a=
few other (non phantom) mics and they have worked ok, without PIP (and wit=
h phantom power switched off).
>
>
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> From: =
ps.com]
> Sent: 18 July 2014 03:09
> To:
> Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] opinions Roland R26 or Tascam DR 680
>
>
>
>
>
> Great thanks Tim,
>
>
>
> Slightly better preamps is attractive as I will mostly do soundscape ambi=
ance recordings=97not using internal mics.
>
>
>
> But otherwise, I do like the size and PIP input that the R26 offers. and =
if the preamps are close=97perhaps the R26 is the way to go.
>
>
>
> {one bit of uncertainty: I just realized that my 1/8=94 electret mic co=
nnectors thru a 1/4=94 adaptor also works in the 3 pin/1/4=94 combo inputs =
of my Zoom with the phantom power turned off in the recorder=97so I am sort=
of assuming (hoping) I can have the 680 also work with my electret mics in=
this manner too --without a PIP input. Is there a reason why this would no=
t work?} .
>
>
>
> Chad
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:45 AM, 'Tim Bartlett' [n=
aturerecordists] <> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hey Chad - we have both these units, what do you want to know? :-)
>
> They are different sorts of recorders really. The R26 is a handy recorder=
,
> with its built in mics, whilst obviously the 680 has no mics. So...do you
> need internal mics?
> Fwiw, the R26 internal mics are decent, but not as good as the Sony D50.
> The R26 is a super flexible unit having internal mics (Omni and XY) and X=
LR
> inputs (and you can record all 6 of those channels at once if you want), =
and
> whilst the preamps are not quite as good as the 680, they are pretty clos=
e,
> and one of the best handy recorders in terms of preamp noise.
> The 680 is certainly aimed at multichannel usage, having 4 XLR inputs, an=
d
> can record 8 channels at once (although only 6 discreet inputs).
>
> So...R26 wins on flexibility having internal mics and XLR inputs, the 680
> wins on multichannel and slightly better preamps...
>
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
>
> Sent: 15 July 2014 18:36
> To:
> Subject: [Nature Recordists] opinions Roland R26 or Tascam DR 680
>
> Been considering an upgrade on my recorder (ZoomH4 N ) to either a Roland
> R26 or a TSCAM DR 680. At this point I am using various em172's
> configurations with battery box (SASS etc). Any thoughts on the R26 vs.
> DR680 would be appreciated.
> Chad
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a sound is worth a thousand
> pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo Groups Links
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus prot=
ection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>=20=09
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirusprote=
ction is active.
>
>
>
>
|