naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: opinions Roland R26 or Tascam DR 680

Subject: Re: opinions Roland R26 or Tascam DR 680
From: "Chad Clifford" =
il.com
Date: Tue Jul 22, 2014 8:31 am ((PDT))

Thanks Tim,
I traded my Strat guitar in on the R26 and happy the choice.  Now into the =
woods for some recording.
Cheers
Chad

On Jul 22, 2014, at 6:04 AM, 'Tim Bartlett'  [nat=
urerecordists] <> wrote:

>
> Hi again Chad,
>
>
>
> Yeah the R26 size is appealing =96 perhaps you should consider whether yo=
u think you will use the extra channels on the 680 or not. The 680 used to =
be double the price of the R26 but can now be picked up cheaper so it is a =
bit of a dilemma.
>
>
>
> As far as your other question goes, I cannot give you any guarantees on t=
hat but would have assumed that would work ok yes=85we have recorded with a=
 few other (non phantom) mics and they have worked ok, without PIP (and wit=
h phantom power switched off).
>
>
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> From:  =
ps.com]
> Sent: 18 July 2014 03:09
> To: 
> Subject: Re: [Nature Recordists] opinions Roland R26 or Tascam DR 680
>
>
>
>
>
> Great thanks Tim,
>
>
>
> Slightly better preamps is attractive as I will mostly do soundscape ambi=
ance recordings=97not using internal mics.
>
>
>
> But otherwise, I do like the size and PIP input that the R26 offers. and =
if the preamps are close=97perhaps the R26 is the way to go.
>
>
>
> {one bit of uncertainty:  I just realized  that my 1/8=94 electret mic co=
nnectors thru a 1/4=94 adaptor also works in the 3 pin/1/4=94 combo inputs =
of my Zoom with the phantom power turned off in the recorder=97so I am sort=
 of assuming (hoping) I can have the 680 also work with my electret mics in=
 this manner too --without a PIP input. Is there a reason why this would no=
t work?} .
>
>
>
> Chad
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:45 AM, 'Tim Bartlett'  [n=
aturerecordists] <> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hey Chad - we have both these units, what do you want to know? :-)
>
> They are different sorts of recorders really. The R26 is a handy recorder=
,
> with its built in mics, whilst obviously the 680 has no mics. So...do you
> need internal mics?
> Fwiw, the R26 internal mics are decent, but not as good as the Sony D50.
> The R26 is a super flexible unit having internal mics (Omni and XY) and X=
LR
> inputs (and you can record all 6 of those channels at once if you want), =
and
> whilst the preamps are not quite as good as the 680, they are pretty clos=
e,
> and one of the best handy recorders in terms of preamp noise.
> The 680 is certainly aimed at multichannel usage, having 4 XLR inputs, an=
d
> can record 8 channels at once (although only 6 discreet inputs).
>
> So...R26 wins on flexibility having internal mics and XLR inputs, the 680
> wins on multichannel and slightly better preamps...
>
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> 
> Sent: 15 July 2014 18:36
> To: 
> Subject: [Nature Recordists] opinions Roland R26 or Tascam DR 680
>
> Been considering an upgrade on my recorder (ZoomH4 N ) to either a Roland
> R26 or a TSCAM DR 680. At this point I am using various em172's
> configurations with battery box (SASS etc). Any thoughts on the R26 vs.
> DR680 would be appreciated.
> Chad
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> "While a picture is worth a thousand words, a sound is worth a thousand
> pictures." R. Murray Schafer via Bernie Krause.
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo Groups Links
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus prot=
ection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>=20=09
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirusprote=
ction is active.
>
>
>
>






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU