[Top] [All Lists]

3. Re: Anthropophony redux

Subject: 3. Re: Anthropophony redux
From: rock_scallop
Date: Sat Jun 28, 2014 10:46 am ((PDT))
<I=E2=80=99d recommend not trying to publish a peer-reviewed science paper =
in a legit publication with the word, anthrophony, representing human-gener=
ated sound.=0D
Not that I have ever written a peer-reviewed paper, but I will now use "ant=
hropophony" when in direct reference to the Soundscape Ecology model that y=
ou have been involved with.  It makes good sense in that context, as it fit=
s into your triad with biophony and geophony. Otherwise I'd say "anthropoge=
nic" is still the word for "human caused" in studies related to nature soun=
ds. =0D
John Hartog=0D

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • 3. Re: Anthropophony redux, john_hartog <=

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU